Sign in

or Register now

BipolarConnect.com

See all of our health sites at www.HealthCentral.com
Saturday, August, 30, 2008

Treating Bipolar Depression: Part I

by  John McManamy
Monday, January 08, 2007
John McManamy
John McManamy
Close
Author and Advocate

John McManamy is a former financial journalist with a law degree. I...

John McManamy

Recent Posts:
View All
Subscribe
In October last year, the FDA approved Seroquel for treating bipolar depression. Currently, there are three medications on the market associated with treating bipolar depression, plus an old standby with some demonstrated effect for this phase of the illness. Now is a good time to review bipolar depression, and how precisely these meds (as well as antidepressants) are supposed to work.

This series of blogs is in three installments. Part I discusses bipolar depression and antidepressants. Parts II and III talk about various meds strategies for different phases of bipolar depression.

Before we proceed: My MD stands for manic depression, not doctor of medicine. The purpose of the following is to help you make informed choices, in partnership with your psychiatrist. In no way is the following to be construed as medical advice. Please fully discuss all matters regarding your treatment with your psychiatrist.

Bipolar Depression

Depression is by far the more prevalent and incapacitating form of bipolar disorder. According to Stanley Foundation Bipolar Network data, bipolar I patients are depressed three days for every one day manic or hypomanic while bipolar II patients are depressed 50 days for every one day hypomanic.

There is strong evidence that many so-called “unipolar” depressions exhibit the qualities of “bipolar” depressions. These are referred to as “highly recurrent” depressions that patients tend to cycle in and out of. These patients may not cycle “up” to the type of hypomania that is the diagnostic threshold for bipolar II, but they may exhibit some under-the-radar tendencies such as staying hypomanic for only a day or two (instead of the minimum of four days mandated by the DSM). Reclassifying these patients as true bipolars could conceivably widen the official bipolar population from two percent to as high as six percent.

Unipolar and bipolar depression may be close diagnostic cousins, but in terms of treatment they are very different. Bipolar patients tend to get misdiagnosed with unipolar depression, and are invariably subjected to endless trials on antidepressants which invariably fail them or even make them worse. If they are lucky, their psychiatrists will wise up and rediagnose them as bipolar. Another alternative is to treat patients with highly recurrent depressions as if they had bipolar disorder.

Confused? Read on

Antidepressant Treatment

Antidepressants are standard treatment for unipolar depression. For bipolar depression, it is a different story. The American Psychiatric Association’s 2002 Treatment Guideline for patients with bipolar disorder recommends using antidepressants only with a mood stabilizer (such as lithium or Depakote). Without a mood stabilizer, there is a serious risk of a bipolar depressed patient switching into mania or hypomania or rapid-cycling. Even with a mood stabilizer, some psychiatrists regard an antidepressant as problematic.

There is no strong clinical evidence for treating bipolar patients with an antidepressant, even with a mood stabilizer. The drug company-sponsored antidepressant trials that have been carried out on large populations of patients with unipolar depressions have never been conducted on those with bipolar depression. This applies to both short-term treatment and long-term treatment.

Ask a Question

Get answers from our experts and community members.

Answer a Question

are my grandchildren safe in this environment?

Answer This View all questions >
Free Newsletter
Get weekly updates, news alerts and more on Bipolar and related health conditions.