Sign in

or Register now

MyBreastCancerNetwork.com

See all of our health sites at www.HealthCentral.com
Friday, November, 21, 2008

Are You Sure You Want That MRI…?

by  PJ Hamel
Thursday, September 11, 2008
PJ Hamel
PJ Hamel
Close
PJ Hamel is happy to be alive. As always.
Author

Writer, mother, wife, volunteer, and survivor: PJ Hamel joins the...

PJ Hamel

Recent Posts:
View All
Subscribe

Can you ever have too much information?

When is it NOT in your best interest to have yet another test?

The answer to those two questions might very well be “Yes,” and “When you’re scheduled for a breast MRI.”

Dr. Richard Bleicher of the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, speaking at the annual breast cancer symposium of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Washington, D.C. earlier this month, is one oncologist who thinks the MRI might just be an overused test that’s actually hurting more women than it helps.

Bleicher noted that women who undergo MRIs start their treatment an average of 3 weeks later than women who forego the test, which has become increasingly popular, especially for younger women, in recent years. And this despite its admitted shortcomings, including a large number of false-positive readings.

MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) is a tool for breast-cancer screening, one often used as a follow-up to mammography. Able to pick up smaller tumors than a standard mammogram, it’s been recommended by the American Cancer Society for screening women in certain high-risk groups: those 30 and older with a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes; those who received radiation therapy for Hodgkins’ disease between the ages of 12 and 18; and those with a strong family history of breast cancer, including two or more close relatives with breast or ovarian cancer, or a close relative who developed breast cancer before the age of 50.

But in recent years, more and more women are asking for (and more and more doctors are prescribing) MRIs as a routine adjunct to mammography, especially when a tumor has been identified. Since one cancer has been found via a mammogram, it’s possible there are additional tumors, ones the mammogram missed; they should be dealt with. So what’s the problem? Isn’t more information a good thing?

Not necessarily. As Dr. Bleicher noted, adding the MRI to an already long battery of tests delays surgery, or the start of chemo or radiation. Since most breast cancers grow very slowly, this delay probably won’t affect the eventual outcome of treatment. But it subjects the woman to 3 weeks of waiting… and we all remember what THAT’S like.

One of the hardest parts of treatment is knowing cancer is in your body, wondering if it’s spreading, and wishing you could have surgery already, for crying out loud. Also, coming right after your diagnosis, when the emotional wound is still fresh, the last thing you want to do is add more stress to your already shocked system. And, trust me; there’s nothing like lots of time on your hands for ratcheting your fears and distress to their highest possible levels.

 “We have yet to see any evidence that MRI improves outcomes when used routinely to evaluate breast cancer, and yet more and more women are getting these scans with almost no discernible pattern,” said Bleicher. “MRI is a valuable tool in some women, but without evidence that routine pre-treatment MRI improves a woman’s outcome, its disadvantages suggest that it should not be a routine part of patient evaluation for treatment,” he concluded.

 

Like what you're reading? Get email notifications when PJ Hamel posts, or get updates on Facebook, iGoogle, your personal blog and more!

Ask a Question

Get answers from our experts and community members.

Answer a Question

what is the cost of arimidex for a month

Answer This View all questions >
Free Newsletter
Get weekly updates, news alerts and more on Breast Cancer and related health conditions.