Sign in

or Register now

MyBreastCancerNetwork.com

See all of our health sites at www.HealthCentral.com
Monday, November, 23, 2009
  • Font size
Featured ContentPJ Hamel On NPR!

Why Do So Few of Us Opt for Reconstruction?

PJ Hamel
PJ Hamel
Close
PJ Hamel is happy to be alive. As always.
Author, breast cancer survivor

Writer, mother, wife, volunteer, and survivor: PJ Hamel joins the...

PJ Hamel

Monday, April 09, 2007
View All of PJ Hamel's Posts
Despite the vast strides plastic surgeons have made in breast reconstruction; despite the positive outcome enjoyed by most women who have reconstruction; and in spite of the fact that federal law mandates insurance companies pick up the tab for it, fewer than 20% of women undergoing mastectomy ...
  1. Joey
    Anonymous
    Tuesday, April 10, 2007 at 11:18 AM
    Please read Joey's story on why she chose breast reconstruction.

    Breast Reconstruction: Just Do It

    http://www.healthcentral.com/breast-cancer/c/4564/8429/reconstructio/



    Reply
  2. choice no reconstruction of breast(s)
    mtn waters
    Tuesday, April 10, 2007 at 11:43 PM
    Please do not hold up the American fetish  surrounding breasts as a reason to consider reconstruction.  Please do not assume women (or men) could not make their own choices.  Doctors are no longer the know all of the options. 

    If a doc won't refer when asked that's a problem.
    Reply
  3. reconstruction pressures?
    PJ Hamel
    Wednesday, April 11, 2007 at 08:32 AM
    Hi mtn waters - I don't "buy in" to any pressure to "look good" as a reason for reconstruction. But I believe that most women want to look like we always have–with two breasts, not one or zero. We don't want to stand out from the crowd; we don't want to see our altered profile and be reminded of cancer. So reconstruction or a prosthesis can definitely help with that. I validate the feelings of any woman who doesn't choose anything beyond mastectomy. This is the MOST personal journey for all of us, and there should be no "shoulds" here - other than the fact that doctors SHOULD offer the reconstruction option to their patients, to take or leave as they see fit. - PJH
    Reply
  4. Personal Choice
    Sarah
    Thursday, April 12, 2007 at 01:40 PM
    Hi PJ, I think that's a great response.  Thanks for clarifying.

    Sarah
    Reply
  5. women choosing reconstruction after mastectomy
    Suzanne
    Tuesday, April 17, 2007 at 10:43 AM
    Reminds me that only ten years ago (I hope no longer) it was the doctor's decision to do a lumpectomy rather than a mastectomy without discussion with the patient!  Doctors made a determination regarding the anticipated cosmetic appearance of the breast after necessary surgery.  If the breast after lumpectomy would look not good in a bra or a bathing suit, the solution was a mastectomy!  Hard to believe!  And removal of the nipple was standard treatment, not a medical necessity in each case.
    Reply
  6. Right on, Joey!
    PJ Hamel
    Tuesday, April 17, 2007 at 11:55 AM
    Thanks so much for sharing, and letting us know it's possible to get a reconstruction years after mastectomy. Your happiness with the result mirrors mine – I realize not everyone is so fortunate, but I'm THRILLED with my tram-flap reconstruction! - PJH
    Reply
  7. Regarding your response to mtn waters
    Ricky
    Tuesday, April 17, 2007 at 03:28 PM

    PJ,

     

    I was glad to see your response to mtn waters, stating that you can validate any patient's feelings of not wanting reconstruction. I was just a little surprised you didn't mention it in your original article. My friend's wife just went through a mastectomy and wanted nothing to do with reconstruction. She simply did not want anything foreign put into her body. I can certainly understand this desire and as you mentioned, respect any wish that a patient might have regarding the issue. I think women should definitely not feel pressured by the media or anyone else.

    Best Wishes,

    Ricky

    Reply
  8. Listen to your heart-
    PJ Hamel
    Tuesday, April 17, 2007 at 03:38 PM
    Hi Ricky: Thanks for taking the time to write. As I write over and over, ALL of this–every decision we make along the way–should be our own decision, made with help from friends, family, and health care pros, but coming ultimately from our own heart. We're the ones who have to live with ourselves - literally!
    Just one clarification - there's nothing foreign in my body. I had body tissue reconstruction, so all that happened was I got a very welcome tummy tuck, with the "extra" removed going up to replace my lost breast. A true win-win! - PJH
    Reply
  9. Thank You, PJ
    Ricky
    Tuesday, April 17, 2007 at 03:48 PM
    PJ, thanks so much for that info. I was not aware of that option. I will pass along the info in case my friend's wife was unaware as well. The correct information is so important!
    Reply
  10. Autologous (body tissue) reconstruction
    PJ Hamel
    Tuesday, April 17, 2007 at 04:56 PM
    Ricky, be aware that implants (saline or silicone) are MUCH more common than autologous (body tissue) reconstructions. There may not be a plastic surgeon who does tissue reconstruction at the hospital your friend is being treated at, unfortunately... but worth asking, anyway. 
    Reply
  11. Reconstructive surgery
    Vickie Hime
    Saturday, March 08, 2008 at 11:49 PM

    I absolutely believe every women should not only be told about reconstructive surgery but should be referred to one as soon as she finds out she has breast cancer prior to surgery. You can not make an informed decison about reconstruction if you only see a plastic surgeon after the fact. I had a lumpectomy in 2001 with radiation. My breast surgeon convinced me that if I had that surgery I would have less than a 4% chance of the cancer coming back. In 2003 it came back as stage 2 same breast & I had had a mamogram less than 6 months prior to finding this lump. I demanded a double mastectomy & immediate reconstructive surgery. Even though I had many reconstructive surgeries due to complications I believe that was due to my breast surgeon, not my plastic surgeon I would not change the decision I made to have the procedures done. Now it is 2008 & I am still cancer free. I live a very happy & full life. I only wanted to try to be back to normal as much as possible after the chemo hell. Going through the reconstruction process gave me something to look forward to.

     

    I also wonder why more women don't have reconstruction done. The things they can do these days are nothing short of a miracle.

    Vickie Hime

    Paris, Texas   

    Reply
    re: Reconstructive surgery
    PJ Hamel
    Sunday, March 09, 2008 at 12:03 PM
    Vickie, congratulations on being 5 years out! That's a milestone for sure. And thanks for this well-written, sensible post. I understand not all women have access to good plastic surgeons, ones who are willing and able to tackle the complicated surgery of reconstruction. But if you DO have a reconstructive surgeon, and health insurance that pays for it, I think reconstruction is a wonderful option. Yes, the recovery time is longer than a simple mastectomy. But I so value the ease and look of reconstruction, vs. a prosthesis, and I've been totally enjoying mine without any problems for 6 years now. Thanks again for connecting, Vickie- PJH
    Reply
    re: re: Reconstructive surgery
    Vickie Hime
    Monday, March 10, 2008 at 12:59 PM

    PJ

    I am very blessed to have 5 years out & I inted to have many more. I am also blessed to have health insurance. I understood that there is a law that requires the insurance companies to pay for plastic surgery until you get semetry. I could be wrong but I think this is a federal law. The thing that bothered me the most was seiing that just one chemo treatment was $5,000. I really wondered what happens to women who don't have insurance. Do they have to die? Do they not get radiation or chemo that has saved my life? Can someone please let me know their experience on that subject. It seems with all the breast cancer programs there are we should have one somewhere that doesn't leave out one person from getting treatment they need for breast cancer.

    Sincerely

     Vickie

    Reply
    re: re: re: Reconstructive surgery
    PJ Hamel
    Monday, March 10, 2008 at 04:11 PM

    Vickie, my understanding is that women won't be denied life-saving treatment if they don't have health insurance; the government steps in via Medicaid, or hospitals foot the bill. I'm not sure about plastic surgery, though - to what extent that's paid for. I recall, as you said, something about guaranteed payment for certain types of plastic surgery after mastectomy or lumpectomy... but can't remember the details.

    You've got a great attitude - keep it up! Cheers- PJH 

    Reply
  12. Why Some May Opt Out of Breast Reconstruction
    Teeni
    Thursday, September 04, 2008 at 10:10 PM

    While I can only speak for myself and from my own experience, I may understand why some women opt out of breast reconstruction.  I think at first, the fright and shock of cancer just makes the patient's immediate response one of "get as much of the cancer out of me as possible." Therefore, reconstruction at that stage isn't as high a priority as getting healthy and getting treated to eliminate as much cancer as possible.  Later, I think that more bilaterial mastectomy patients may decline reconstruction altogether because it isn't life saving surgery and they are at least symmetrical, so they may feel it would be better to just go on with life, rather than submit to more surgeries.  For unilateral patients, I would expect more of them will desire reconstruction in order to achieve some sort of symmetry.  However, delayed reconstructions are difficult for someone who has gone through the fear and lengths to treat the cancer.  Left on their own to find a surgeon that they will be comfortable with to perform the surgery is a daunting task.  There are plenty of plastic surgeons out there who make a pretty penny doing breast enlargements and lifts.  For the cancer survivor, being herded through routines like exams and videos and forms, in a setting that obviously caters to the cosmetic surgeries, is a very uncomfortable and cold experience.   It is actually almost insulting.   As if having/being treated for cancer wasn't bad/hard/scary enough.  I think we need more surgeons who specialize in reconstruction or who have compassion dealing with cancer/reconstruction patients.

    Reply
  • Font size
  • Bookmark
  • Thank you for your input
  • Save
  • RSS
  • Report Abuse

Ask a Question

Get answers from our experts and community members.

View all questions (3920) >