Hello,
I have been diagnosed with IDC Grade I tumors (3) that are .5cm. There is micrometastasis (1.5mm) to one lymph node. Currently, I am undergoing 8 rounds of chemotherapy (4 rounds of Adriamycin and Cytoxan and 4 rounds of Taxotere). I have not had surgery yet. I am so confused about whether since my tumor is "less aggressive" and the lymph node involvement is so small, do I REALLY need to be so aggressive with the treatments? Do I REALLY NEED radiation or only if the there are more lymph nodes positive? I am so confused and my doctors don't give me straight answers. It seems to be the opinion of my surgeon that I need a lumpectomy and radiation, but I am not sure and there is no one to talk to! I know it is a personal decision, but I don't feel like I have all of the facts about my risks. I don't want a recurrence, but I don't want to be overly aggressive unnecessarily either. Is there some formula I can follow? Is radiation recommended only for a certain number of positive lymph nodes?
Sorry this is so long. I am very confused even after consulting two doctors . . . especially after consulting two doctors with very different answers!
Thanks for any advice you can give.






Can you please let me know where you got the statistic of 80% of those with idc do not benefit from toxic therapy? I am 52, also IDC grade 2, stage 1, ER,PR+, HER2+ - no node involvement, and mass less than .o6 cm, oncotype score of 23. I had a bi-lateral masectomy and my doctor still wants to do chemo with herceptin, followed by AI for 5 years. I think the chemo would do more harm than good.