Hi Anna,

I had to make the same decision 6 years ago and it is a very tough personal choice.  Your current age is also something to consider.  I was 49 at diagnosis of Stage 2, had the bilateral mastectomy and got 3 different opinions about chemo.  All 3 oncologists said I should definitely have chemo but they all had different drugs to offer.  They believed it was best to "hit it early and hit it hard" so I chose to do the chemo (middle of the road option).

Everyone reacts differently to chemo and it was no picnic, but for me it was do-able.  I managed to work thru most of it thanks to an understanding and flexible boss.  Some people tell me I didn't need to do it but I am a worrier and wanted to do everything I could to reduce risk of reoccurence (although it is always there to some degree).

And as the other wise women have said, once you make your decision please try not to second-guess it -- that's just torture you don't need.  Good luck and best wishes to you!

Cheryl

Hi Anna - I can see where you're coming from.  i'm in the same boat, though I don't know about my oncotype, and will have to ask for the test.  My concern is that 3 years ago when I was first diagnosed I went through a mastectomy and chemo - then while I was having reconstruction earlier this year my plastic surgeon found that I has suspicious scar tissue that tested positive for cancer.  I had the tumor from my chest wall removed and did 31 sessions of radiation.  As you may have heard, some forms of chemo can only be taken once.  I did the AC combo the first time, which is hard on your heart.  This time the doctor is recommending a taxol based combo which I have read can be hard on your liver.  This brings me a lot of concern, as my mother died 2 years ago from liver failure - she was not a drinker, and we're not totally sure how it happened, and so sudden to top it off (she was dx in Feb. and passed away in July).  Because of this, and the fact that I do take various meds and have the occasional drink (like one or two a week if even that) I worry about the effects this chemo drug would be on my liver and if the benefits out weigh the risks.

Right now I am waiting to talk with another medical oncologist to see what he says.  My husband supports me on the liver thing, but I'm not sure yet how he would feel if I choose not to do chemo as both his father and grandfather died from cancer.  I'm worried he'll see it as me giving up, which is not true.  I'm only 34 and my original cancer was only a stage IIa - and even with a recurrence, it still had not spread.....so I don't beleive I'm anywhere near the end of the road.  I understand your struggle and the conflicts it brings - but as everyone has said, only you can decide your fate.

My advice is to gather all your info, get the facts, educate yourself about the drug, it's effects, and so forth then go from there.  Most doctors are going to push it regardless of it's need.  Cancer is a billion dollar industry and this is how they make their money.  I know from my past experiences, chemo ran upwards of $1000 a pop (plus "other" fees) and even though your insurance will cover this for you and you're not paying out of pocket, the doc is still making quite a bit off of you as a patient.  So you do what you think is best for you and not for your doctor's bank account - because you are the one who has to live with your decisions and regrets, not him.

Best of luck to you!

Angi

Anna...so proud of you...The bisophosphinate study is quite a commmittment with it's own side effects..great.. I wasn't as brave.. your oncologists sounds wonderful..supportive and smart..tell him his words helped me!! good luck. good luck with reconstruction.. we seem to be on a similar timeline..( I just had my last fill)