A few months ago I woke up with inflammation, redness and pain in my right breat. My doctor said it was either mastitis or ibc and prescribed me antibiotics. (I am 49 years old and not breastfeeding). My inflammation reponded within a few days with the prescribed antibiotics. To be safe my doctor did a mammogram and ultrasound, which showed a lump or mass in my right breast. A MRI showed further that a biopsy was needed. The doctor did an ultrasound guided vaccum assisted tissue biopsy. The biopsy results showed that I had fibro.... not cancer. My question is do you think that the doctors did everything necessary to rule out Ibc or should I still be concerned. I have not had any more inflammation or pain and its been almost three months.






Mal, the next important step is to find out the cause of the inflammation. If your doctor has an adequate explanation for why your breast is inflamed and a plan for making it better, then you should try that plan and hope that it works. As you are describing the situation at the moment, it sounds as if your doctor is saying just live with inflammation. I would not find that acceptable and would either go back to the doctor and ask for more information or look for a new doctor. Often mammograms of women with inflammatory breast cancer do show changes in symmetry, skin thickness, and breast density from previous images, so if you have previous mammograms make sure a comparison was done. Because you do not currently have the most typical IBC symptoms, which are redness, skin dimpling, and swelling throughout the breast, the doctor is probably not ready to go to the next diagnostic step for IBC, which would be a biopsy that includes the skin of the breast. If you don't see improvement, I would suggest nagging the doctor until you are satisfied that you have been properly diagnosed.