I got the results of my biopsy last night and my pathology report today and was hoping someone could help me to understand my diagnosis and my options. I've done a little research, but am having trouble finding information on some of the items on the pathology report. I'll copy the parts that I think are the most relevant:
Ductal carcinoma in situ, solid type, with apocrine features, intermediate nuclear grade, with necrosis and calcifications. DCIS measures 0.9 centimeter in greatest histological extent and involves five core biopsies with additional fragments of DCIS embedded in blood coagulum.
Estrogen Receptor: positive (1-3+ staining in 90% of DCIS nuclei).
Progesterone Receptor: positive (1-3+ staining in 99% of DCIS nuclei).
I understand the diagnosis of DCIS, the type, and the grade. I believe the necrosis indicates more rapid cell division, so I assume that's a sign that it's somewhat more aggressive than DCIS without necrosis; is that correct? Can someone tell me the significance of apocrine features and fragments embedded in blood coagulum?The positive hormone receptors means that I may be a candidate for certain medications, if I understand correctly.
The pathologist told me I'd probably have a lumpectomy and radiation. I'm not the kind of person that wants to do the most radical thing "just in case." I'm reluctant to even take antibiotics when I'm sick. I prefer the most natural and gentle approach possible. I know that with a diagnosis of cancer, I'll have to be flexible, but I refuse to let them start slicing and irradiating me without at least having examined all my options.



It takes awhile, but it all sinks in. Life goes on, it really does, and we go with it. Be well- PJH


Thanks for your quick reply. I should have mentioned that I'd read the very helpful Guide to Understanding Your Pathology Report as well as the list of terms on the Johns Hopkins/Avon Foundation site. I didn't see much about apocrine features, but I'm starting to think that's not terribly important.
Your take on the necrosis is comforting and after reading the report about a million times I'd come to the same conclusion on the DCIS in blood coagulum. Since it was mentioned in the same part of the report when he was giving measurements, I'm guessing he was just adding up all the places it was found. I will ask the oncologist though.
I'll probably end up doing what they say, even though it really bothers me. I do have a strong family history of breast cancer (both sides of my family). I just don't want to make an uninformed decision. Some sites that I've read say that it's not really cancer and most of the time doesn't become cancer. Then I'll read another site that says don't mess around, it's cancer and it's serious. The thought of exposing myself to radiation and taking pharmaceutical drugs for five years and having surgery for something that might not even become "real" cancer just rubs me the wrong way. I'm just not a huge fan of western medicine, although I know it can be life-saving. But if my life's not in danger, I'd rather stick to my more natural approach. My GP provides integrated care (western and alternative), but he told me today I need to have surgery.
Thank you again for taking the time to respond and for your support.