Hello again! I went to an oncologist today with more results from the second biopsy and sentinel node results. The initial pathology report showed a 5.2 cm mass, HER2+, estrogen negative, progesterone positive cancer; after the second biopsy, the margins were clear and the sentinel node and one other were clear (good news?). The oncologist staged the cancer at IIb, and proceeded to dictate that I have radiation followed by chemotheraphy using a cocktail of Herceptin, antihormone and chemo. I was shocked. He based his treatment recommendation on a 10-year-old clinical study done at UCLA for Stage IV metastisized breast cancer patients. Is there a less aggressive therapy that might be available to me? About 15 minutes into his scripted spiel, the oncologist began to refer to me in the third person while he addressed only my husband as though I was not in the room (this went on for about 10 minutes). The most horrible thing he said to me when I questioned him was, "If you want to voice your opinion and call the shots, this isn't going to work." I actually wrote that down. Fortunately, my husband has a calming effect on me. I definitely walked into a cookie-cutter approach to treating cancer with this particular individual, and I will be seeking another oncologist, but I was hoping you might be able to give me some insight as to options that might be available to me. Thanks!









Actually, PJ, she would not be taking the Herceptin for years. Normally people take Herceptin for a year, and no longer. It is typically given with chemo, but may be given as soon as chemo is completed. Since Herceptin has cardiotoxic effects, researchers are looking into shorter treatment times.