Monday, February 13, 2012

Glycemic Index Lags Behind Low-Carb Acceptance

The new nutrition recommendations that the American Diabetes Association issued last week budged the premier American diabetes association into the 21th Century. It gave its limited -- and probably reluctant -- stamp of approval to low-carb diets. But the ADA moved little or no distance further in...
Anonymous
Rob
1/ 4/08 12:48pm
I think this is in conformity with Bernstein's comments on Glycemic Index. The problem is that if you use insulin you still have to account for all the carbs and excess proteins you consume. For us T2s with residual or better natural insulin production it may be possible to add some low index carbs back into our diet once we really have figured out how to get our BGs where we want. I am getting close to that point, but there are just too many variables to cope with on that task than to add another.
Anonymous
Steve
1/ 5/08 6:50am
Was that a typo?  .43 percent?  .0043???  How is this even measureable?
1/ 5/08 10:56am

Dear Steve,

 

I puzzled to about the way that is expressed! In the original article (which I cited) it says literally:

 

Low-GI diets reduced HbA1c by 0.43% points (CI 0.72–0.13) over and above that produced by high-GI diets. 

 

So I don't think it is a typo in my article or in the original. But I do think that the reduction is about half a percentage point, as us laypeople understand it.

 

Best regards,

 

David 

Anonymous
nonegiven
1/ 7/08 6:01pm

A reduction of 0.43% in a 7% A1c would get you an A1c of 6.57% Sometimes people forget that the A1c is expressed as a percentage.

 

1/ 7/08 6:49pm

Right. Well said.

 

David