-
Truvia
Earlene
Wednesday, January 07, 2009 at 05:05 PM -
Sweeteners
Gracie
Wednesday, January 07, 2009 at 09:05 PMHi David,
So if I understand correctly, the Splenda in my am coffee isn't a problem as I'm eating breakfast with it? That's about the only time I use artificial sweeteners.
Hugs,
Gracie
-
Sweeteners
drscll
Thursday, January 08, 2009 at 12:45 PMDoes this mean that the insulin release itself is not a problem? I am trying to go 'No Grain" and Mercola prohibits no-calorie sweeteners too. It is really hard to have nothing sweet at all and a little stevia now and then would be great.
re: Sweeteners
Emmie
Thursday, January 08, 2009 at 02:13 PMThis article flies in the face of all the other published studies out there. Splenda has been found to cause bonding problems with food molecules and aspartame 'can' create a myriad of problems. I found out the latter the hard way. I had never read anything on it when it became toxic to me, causing urine retention, incredible urges for sweets, headaches and other problems. Raw sugar is fairly low in carbs, and we don't have to have sweet drinks. I'm just cautioning judicious use of these artificial ingredients.
-
Aspartame
Dee
Thursday, January 08, 2009 at 02:42 PMThis is poison, it is a chemical, is not good at all for consumption of any living being. I recently stopped chewing the gum I have used for years, sugar free, with aspartame, I feel so good now! So many sick people, so much cancer, ever wonder where it all comes from? Prehaps look strongly at what we ingest!

-
Untitled Comment
Monica Cohee
Thursday, January 08, 2009 at 05:30 PM -
Sweeteners
DAR
Thursday, January 08, 2009 at 10:12 PMGreat timing, David! I was just going to pick your brain about erythritol. I have been using it in my recipes quite a bit recently and found it doesn't show up on my meter, so I thought it was a great sweetener to use. But I just got an A1c of 5.2, though my BGLs run in the 70s and 80s most of the time; I'm rarely over 100. (I test fasting and 2 hours after every meal.) I don't eat fruit because fructose can "go around" my meter yet show up on my A1c. Do you think erythritol might do this, too? I haven't seen any studies about it and thought you might have.
I have also seen recommendations for using D-ribose for CFS and Fibromyalgia and have read that it actually lowers BGLs temporarily. But I'm leery of trying it for the same reason: might it affect my A1c even if it doesn't show up in my BGLs? I don't want to cause problems with my diabetes control while trying to fix my pain and fatigue issues. Do you have info about D-ribose?
Maybe I need to buy my own A1c test and test myself; my doctor has told me he has had his lab recalibrate their equipment when A1c tests were lower than the doc thought was accurate in the past. I am wracking my brain for a reason my A1c would be higher than previously (4.9 a year ago and 5.0 last July) when my BGLs have been as good or better. I should have been well under 5.0.
I am so glad to see this recent study about sweeteners! I have been saying for quite some time that diet sodas (with or without food) don't affect my BGLs or weight at all. And they don't make me hungry; in fact, they keep my stomach happy between meals. (I drink Splenda-sweetened, caffeine-free diet sodas and "fizzy waters.") I'm glad to hear they don't affect my insulin levels, either. Thank you for your article!
re: Sweeteners
David Mendosa
Thursday, January 08, 2009 at 10:52 PMDear DAR,
I don't know anything about D-ribose. But erythritol has a glycemic index of zero and 0.2 calories/gram, the lowest of all the sugar alcohols. See http://mendosa.com/netcarbs.htm
If I were you, I would consider the A1C test that I wrote about at "A Better A1C Test:"
http://www.healthcentral.com/diabetes/c/17/48090/a1c-test
I am buying them regularly myself now.
Best regards,
David
-
Truvia
Anonymous
Friday, January 09, 2009 at 01:27 PMre: Truvia
David Mendosa
Friday, January 09, 2009 at 03:00 PMI'm glad that you pointed this out, because the answer is both complicated and interesting. I just used a packet of Truvia myself in a glass of unsweetened almond milk and happen to have the Truvia box handy. It does say, as you point out, that each packet has 3 grams of carbs. You know, I'm sure, that the Nutrition Facts labels usually say how many of the carbs grams are sugars and how many are fiber, because those grams of fiber have almost no effect on our blood glucose.
In the case of Truvia the sub-listing for carbs is different. It says "Erythritol 3g." So all of the grams of carbs in Truvia come from erythritol.
The really interesting thing is that erythritol is different from anything else that I have ever heard of. You may want to read the complete Wikipedia entry on erythritol at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erythritol or the other articles about erythritol when you do a Google search.
But in a nutshell erythritol is absorbed into the bloodstream in the small intestine and then for the most part excreted unchanged. It is almost completely non-caloric (under FDA regulations is has 0.2 calories per gram and has no effect on our blood glucose. It is not technical fiber. But it works in essentially the same way that fiber does
What a great question!
David
-
Truvia and carbs
colliemom
Sunday, January 11, 2009 at 12:04 PM -
I would love to know...
Dana
Friday, January 23, 2009 at 11:43 AM...whether earlier studies about non-nutritive sweeteners forgot to take the bulking agent into account. For instance, aspartame and sucralose, when sold as packet or bulk sweeteners, are bulked out with maltodextrin.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dextrin
Says there that maltodextrin is a polysaccharide, which can mean anything from cellulose to table sugar. (All carbs, nutritionally speaking, are sugars of varying complexity.) The article says it is easily digested, so it's more like table sugar than like cellulose. Stands to reason it would cause an insulin release.
Maybe the latest study used pure sweeteners without the bulking agents. That might explain the difference in outcome.
Truvia will probably work out better in that vein as long as the erythritol can't be digested by anyone. One of the problems with most sugar alcohols is that some people can digest them and therefore they act like sugar in the body. If that isn't going to be an issue with this one, then Truvia will probably agree with a lot more people's bodies. I hope so, because I really like it. Now maybe they should try combining sucralose and erythritol, because I would SO be there. :)
re: I would love to know...
David Mendosa
Friday, January 23, 2009 at 01:29 PMDear Dana,
You raise an important point about bulking agents. Indeed, maltodextrin can have a quite high glycemic index and there is quite a lot of it in a packet of aspartame and sucralose, as you say.
In fact, you got me thinking about taking packets of Truvia with me. Once in a while I use packets of Splenda (sucralose) in restaurants. But I can take a totally non-caloric sweetener with me now!
Best regards,
David
- Font size
- Email This
- Bookmark
- Thank you for your input
- Save
- RSS
- Report Abuse











I recently tried Truvia and was not impressed. Firstly the main ingrediant is erythritol followed by rebiana (their brand of refined stevia) and then unknown natural flavors. The texture is very much like sugar, the taste includes the coolness of erythritol and a strong after taste. I have overactive taste buds so it might just be me. I use erythritol occasionally on its own, and also stevia, but prefer a small amount of real sugar used only when eating a meal. I am wondering if others perceive an strong aftertaste.