Sign in

or Register now

MyDiabetesCentral.com

See all of our health sites at www.HealthCentral.com
Tuesday, November, 24, 2009
  • Font size
Shedding Light on the Co-morbidities of DiabetesThe Complications of Having Rheumatoid Arthritis and Diabetes

Cancer Risks from Insulin

Gretchen Becker
Gretchen Becker
Close
Author, Humorist, wildlyfluctuating.blogspot.com

Gretchen Becker studied biology for 8 years at Radcliffe/Harvard,...

Gretchen Becker

Monday, June 29, 2009
View All of Gretchen Becker's Posts
Normal 0 The buzz on the Internet this weekend  is the news that insulin glargine (Lantus) might increase cancer rates. Needless to say, this is very upsetting news to a lot of people, although Lantus has been linked with cancer in the past.   Dr. Bill Quick has provided a good overv...
  1. everybody does it
    frankenduf
    Monday, June 29, 2009 at 05:24 PM

    nice post- all things in moderation is the wisdom that keeps resurfacing throughout the $zillions in research

    my thought on your (rhetorical?!) question about the ADA is that it is their somewhat pessimistic, PC approach to diet counseling- that is, the philospophy used is that everyone wants to have their cake and eat it too, so who are we to judge, etc etc- so the pre-research based decision is to incorporate carbs/sweets into the DM diet, cuz they'll eat it anyway- i have personally seen this debate in planning hospital diet patterns for DM- the PC administration conservatively adds in sweets and juice into the meals in order not to offend anyone- so how ironic when i get cussed out by a DM pt. exclaiming "why am i getting cake and juice on my tray- you tryna kill me?" :)- sigh- i personally fall in the low CHO camp, but in the end, if a diabetic patient wants to make 'starch the star', i will agree to disagree with them, but still advise how to attenuate the GLC from there

    Reply
    re: everybody does it
    Gretchen Becker
    Sunday, July 05, 2009 at 11:11 AM

    The original reason the ADA and others prescribed a high-carb diet was that they believed that fat caused heart disease and a lot of protein caused kidney problems. The only thing left was carbohydrate, and they figured you could cover that with insulin.

     

    Since then, the fat hypothesis has been questioned by a lot of people and it's been shown that protein doesn't harm healthy kidneys. Furthermore, with the CGMs, they've shown that even if insulin can "cover" carbs in the sense that BG is normal before the next meal, it may go very high in between, when people didn't use to mention, and some people feel that these swings are dangerous.

     

    So the question is when the ADA is going to change their position. They'll never admit they were wrong, instead they'll say, "New research shows that on high-carb diets, postprandial BG levels are too high," something that patients with meters have known for a long time.

     

    Many patients who continue to eat sweets and bread do so because their CDEs have told them it's OK as long as they're low fat. Some people will continue to eat those things no matter what, but others would switch to something else with support from their CDEs.

     

     

    Reply
  • Font size
  • Bookmark
  • Thank you for your input
  • Save
  • RSS
  • Report Abuse

Ask a Question

Get answers from our experts and community members.

View all questions (2364) >