-
Continuous BG meeter
W H
Wednesday, October 07, 2009 at 11:22 AMre: BMSG
JG
Wednesday, October 07, 2009 at 01:42 PMre: Continuous BG meeter
Gretchen Becker
Wednesday, October 07, 2009 at 04:05 PMI agree with you both. Unfortunately, the sensors for the CGM are still pretty expensive. I was paying for my own, and so although it was wonderful to have, I decided it was not accurate enough to warrant the cost full time. I found I was spending almost as much time calibrating the Dex as I was getting useful information from it.
I'm not interested in transmitting my BGs to my doctors, as most of them wouldn't bother to look at it. All they care about is the A1c. When I showed my endo the printout from the CGM, she didn't really understand it!
re: re: Continuous BG meeter
WH
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 12:22 PMI am using the Navigator CGM. It reads about 20 points lower than the Aviva single meter. I know that is not accurate. I use it to show me when a BG rise starts, when it levels of, when it starts to drop, and what is the delta spread between the various readings. I use it to test foods and insulins. Does it make sense? Can you comment on this? Any additional ideas?
re: re: re: Continuous BG meeter
Gretchen Becker
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 04:35 PMWhat do you use to calibrate the Navigator? If you're using the Aviva to calibrate, it doesn't make sense that it would be 20 points lower. Or is the Navigator one that has the built-in FreeStyle meter? If that's the case, how do you know which meter is more accurate?
I agree with you that the main purpose of a CGM is to show trends, so you'll know when to test with your regular meter. I used it that way when I was experimenting with bolus insulins. I would inject the insulin and watch the CGM until the BG started going down just a little, and then I'd test with the Ultra and quickly eat, knowing that the CGM lags about 15 minutes behind the regular meters.
My biggest problem with regular meters is planning to do some testing and then getting involved with something else (like this) and forgetting to retest when I'd planned to. The CGM covered my brain lapses.
-
Even pre-diabetics should test
Dave in Md
Wednesday, October 07, 2009 at 03:17 PMGretchen, thank you for your article. I will agree testing without being given the knowledge to use the information is useless. I have met a number of people that are not given direction other than 'cut back on your sugars and see me in 4 months' this is almost as bad as the ADA over-carb and over-medicate method. I was at least given targets to shoot for, and learned early on to test every new food to see how I reacted, and to get my numbers as close to a non diabetic as I could. Also the CDE who teach the ADA way should teach that there are other methods and that you can chose to work at a healthier range. The medical field as a whole needs to drop the ADA way and learn that they can better help their patients.
re: re: Even pre-diabetics should test
Dave in Md
Wednesday, October 07, 2009 at 04:33 PMHi Gretchen, well I was not given enough, but I am of an engineering background and being of that persuasion, I dug for info. I had numbers to use to make work, now there was and still are some unknown variables that I am unable to compensate for but my last HbA1c was 5.6 so not too shabby. hey we need spell check here I am not much on spelling.
re: Even pre-diabetics should test
julie
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 04:53 PMOh my GOSH, i just had to reply to this. When i was diagnosed with type II 2 years ago, i was devastated. Sent home with prescriptions , and told to eat more salads !! I'm serious. Bless my computer. Over the past couple of years, i have joined "groups" for support and done my own research online. For example, i had no idea exercising would bring down my numbers like they did. I had no clue what to eat, when to eat it, and a friend helped me figure out the meter. In the beginning dr was testing my blood every three mnths at least, but again, when she didnt get the result she wanted, it was just EAT BETTER ! What a nightmare. ON MY OWN, i gradually found out enough to bring all my numbers down to a healthy range, and my next goal is to get off such a high dose of these "metformin" pills. 2000 mg a day. When i ask her to take me off them or at least cut back, she tells me she wants my weight down more before we can do that. hmm.
sorry for rambling, i had to vent on that remark about patients not knowing , or not being told or educated enough.
thanks,
julie
re: re: Even pre-diabetics should test
Jacqueline
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 09:41 PMI was fortunate enough to have an insurance company that offered me two consulatations with a dietician as well as one with a nurse. Between that and the internet I learned what I needed to know. After 2 years, I was experiencing too many hypoglycemic attacks and made a decision to cut my medication in half, without my doctor's knowledge or suggestion. On my last visit, as she congratulated me on my great numbers I informed her that 3 months prior I had cut my medication in half. This may not have been the wisest thing to do, but it did work for me. While she was a bit surprised, she encouraged me to continue with the decreased amount and agreed with me that my diabetes is in my hands she is only there to help. So far another 3 months have gone by and my numbers are still great. Obviously once I changed my diet, which got my diabetes under control 2000 mg of metformin a day and the glyburide was too much. I suggest anyone who is experiencing hypoglycemic attacks take this into consideration and speak to their doctor.
re: re: Even pre-diabetics should test
krysta le
Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 10:24 PMI totally agree with you about testing. How would you control you blood sugar if you don't know the number? When i was diagnosed with pre-diabetes, on my first visit to my doctor, he prescribed Metformin and tell me to eat "LESS". I did not have a clue about "eat LESS". Less what? and how much is Less? Through a friend and thanks to the computer, I learned what Carbs foods do to my BS. I make sure to test my blood sugar 4 times a day and exercise every day. 3 months after the visit, I went back to see him with an average BS between 100 and 110 and 13 pounds lighter, my doctor ask me How did I do? In the long run, I think test strips are much cheaper than any prescriptions and complications.
-
Untitled Comment
Alan S
Wednesday, October 07, 2009 at 06:18 PM"Test strips are much cheaper than dialysis."
To me that says it all. They are also cheaper than a bypass operation, training a guide dog, amputations and orthotics, electric scooters or constant nursing care.
None of the various "studies" supposedly discovering a lack of benefit from testing have applied SMBG in the systematic way that you and I understand to modify the patient's lifestyle for better blood glucose management. All of them presume testing's only function is to check on fasting and two-hour post-prandials to allow doctors to assess medication and insulin needs. None include dietary modification.
Another point worth noting is that almost all of these "studies" originate in countries where the government subsidises test strips, most notably the UK but also in Canada and Australia. The bean counters are looking at ways to reduce the budget.
The one you refer to is European but appears to have been organised from the UK. There is a concerted effort by the NHS to minimise strip use, with several recent papers of this type such as Farmer et al :
Impact of self monitoring of blood glucose in the management of patients with non-insulin treated diabetes: open parallel group randomised trial
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/bmj.39247.447431.BEv1
Or this recent piece of accountant's drivel:
Excessive spending on selfmonitoring blood glucose in T2D
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/122379005/PDFSTART?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
Someday, somewhere, a researcher is finally going to discover "test, test, test". In effect that is CGMS without the equipment.
re: Untitled Comment
Gretchen Becker
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 10:53 AM"Test test test" is good, but CGM can catch highs and low that occur at times you didn't think to test.
My A1c always seems higher than it should be according to my BG levels, even when I'm using a CGM. But seeing that I wasn't going high overnight was very useful, as I knew that wasn't the explanation. The only thing I can come up with is that my red blood cells live longer than normal.
re: re: Untitled Comment
Pat
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 04:38 PM -
SMBG
Gracie
Wednesday, October 07, 2009 at 07:30 PMUpon diagnosis I was given a script for testing supplies & a monitor. Then send to a CDE for advice. That was it. But I am a very determined person & decided that if there was a wqay to defeat this disease I would find it.
And I have. Since then I've gone low carb, test 3 times a day and have gotten my A1C from a not so perfect 10 to a very respectable 5.1. I'm aiming for 4 something, but not sure if I can get it that low ( but boy would I like to!).
Without my meter telling me what to eat & what not to, you might as well shoot me at diagnosis!
Hugs,
Gracie
re: SMBG
Gretchen Becker
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 10:56 AMGracie, what you and other determined patients have shown is that it is possible to get close to normal BG levels when one makes some effort to do so. The sad thing is that so many patients aren't willing to do this. They want a pill so they can eat the same way they've always eaten.
So the blame is not just on the shoulders of the doctors.
What we need is a massive education campaign so the uninformed know what they need to do, so at least some of them will demand proper care.
re: re: SMBG
Gracie
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 07:28 PMGretchen,
Yes, sadly many take exactly that approach ( which is probably why many doc's don't bother to try to offer it "no one's going to work that hard" ) And my hubby has a co worker who actually says " I'll eat what I want, there's a pill for that" . I just hope she changes her mind before she starts to lose body parts! Have a gal from work, who did not take good care of herself, ate anything she wanted, wasn't good about testing & now has 1 leg off at mid calf, the other at the hip. Makes me so mad, she could have prevented it, but chose not too.
Hugs,
Gracie
-
Untitled Comment
Monica Cohee
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 07:59 AMWhy would they even publish an article telling us not to check our BG?
Gretchen I agree with your article.
My endocrinolgoist pulls my BG test results from my meter everytime I go to his office. If he didn't think it was important for me to keep track of my numbers he surely would tell not to test my BG. I like to see what morning, noon, evening and bedtime BG readings. These tests let me know if something is wrong. Eg to high, to low etc.
Thanks for your article!
-
Right On Gretchen!
Ann Bartlett
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 12:35 PMIn 39 years of having type 1 diabetes, my chief complaint has been finding a diabetes team who would help me interpret the information from my blood sugar readings! For my type 2 friends, I feel your frustration, I went to an endo whose patients were 90% type 2. She did nothing but blame the patients for out of control blood sugars, but the fact was she never offered real education or support, like a CDE! Whose to blame for no change?
Whatever the reason, too many people are walking around feeling guilty, non compliant and depressed for not caring enough to know what to do. Doctors need to think about what they have offered in education to their patients and patients need to work at knowing as much as they can to ask for better management skills! I often feel type 2 diabetes is harder than type 1, because of just this kind of issue. Thanks for for a great post!
re: Right On Gretchen!
Gretchen Becker
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 04:19 PMAnn, thanks for your supportive comments. I think each type of diabetes has its problems and its benefits. Type 2s are more apt to get complications even with good control because they've probably had it for 10 years or so before diagnosis and often get blamed for "bringing it on themselves." But type 1s can't take "vacations."
I think we need to support each other. Too many people think the other type has it easy. Not so! It's difficult for us all in ways that people without the disease can't understand.
I'm sorry you've had difficulty find a supportive health care "team." I've never really expected to have a team. I have different doctors and it's up to me to coordinating their findings. Maybe we really need to get our support from each other, by sharing strange BG patterns and using many minds to try to interpret them.
Have you used diabetes software to try to find patterns in your BG results?
-
ALWAYS TEST BLOOD SUGAR!
rainbowkathy
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 03:46 PMi've been a Diabetic over 36 yrs. I had went thru so much of
Diabetes complications and I've always tested my Blood sugar
4-8 times a day. Doesn't bother me doing it all the times. How
are you going to know what the BS count is. I have 70 in am
by noon someday up to 200. WHY same food I eat everyday at
breakfast, this is an example. WHY it so IMPORTANT to TESTS
ALL THE TIMES. Good luck with those who taking a chance with
your Diabetic life .
Rainbow Kathy - New Jersey
re: re: ALWAYS TEST BLOOD SUGAR!
rainbowkathy
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 07:22 PMI'm a Type 2 Been on Insulln pump over 6 yrs. now. Used to injected 4 - 5 times day.
My last Ac1 was 6.9 before that was 6.3 also is using REGULAR INSULIN 500mg. which is a CONCENTRATED INSULIN, also take SYMLIN 120 mcg. injections 3 x day.
before meals and last take Glimerpride diabetes pill 4mg. 2 x day.
Blood sugar sometime 8am 70-150 lunch 167-225 5pm 120-180 9pm 130-200
I'm obesity all my life hard to lose weight cause of 500 unit of concentrated insulin.
I'm please when I switch over a year ago it has help me alot. Before on 100 units
a day never out of 200 all day. I hope I answer your question ok. Let me know.
Rainbow Kathy
re: re: re: ALWAYS TEST BLOOD SUGAR!
Gretchen Becker
Friday, October 09, 2009 at 10:06 AMKathy, I agree it's difficult to lose weight when you're on insulin and a sulf. You're taking symlin. Have you asked your doctor about Byetta? If you're taking a sulf, your doctor seems to think you're able to produce some insulin yourself, so the Byetta might work for you.
Regardless, controlling BG is more important than losing weight. I know you're doing what you can to control it. Are you on a low-carb diet? If not, you might want to look into that as it would reduce the amount of insulin you need.
re: re: re: re: ALWAYS TEST BLOOD SUGAR!
rainbowkathy
Friday, October 09, 2009 at 03:34 PMYes I've been on Low Carb Diet for long time now. 8am 26-30 12pm 30-40
5pm 30-48 9pm snack 15-20
yesterday my blood sugar was 8am 70 noon 118 5pm 162 9pm 276 WHY
I used a low carb recipe for oven bakes catfish, does catfish high in carb i don't know
couldn't find an info. on that 1 piece instant potatoes 18g and aspargarus 4 Ice Tea I cant eat any kind of ceral cause it always go over 200 by noon here again no
sense. My body doesn't always work good on low carb body is weird. Talk soon.
re: re: re: re: re: ALWAYS TEST BLOOD SUGAR!
Gretchen Becker
Friday, October 09, 2009 at 08:04 PMIf those numbers (26-30, etc.) are carb counts, for some of us, that wouldn't be considered low carb. Instant potatoes would make my BG go over 200, I'm sure. Try mashed cauliflower with some butter or cream cheese instead.
Richard K. Bernstein (author of The Diabetes Solution) says don't eat more than 12 g of carb per meal, except breakfast, when you aim for 6. That's what many of us consider really low carb. But not everyone is that extreme. It depends on how many carbs you can deal with. If your BGs are too high after meals, that means you can't deal with that many carbs.
You could try even fewer carbs, but you say your body doesn't work well on less carb. It does take several days for the body to adapt.
re: re: ALWAYS TEST BLOOD SUGAR!
rainbowkathy
Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 09:15 AMHello,
Someone has to show me how you can eat carb. Everything you pick up has carbs,
I've been trying to yrs. You're telling me to eat 12 per milk there no way my 1% low fat milk is alread has 12 carbs. I pick instant potato caused that only has 18 carbs
where regular potatoes has 27, If there a way could you tell me or name of book i
could buy I probably has it already in my cllection. Thank you for your help with this
matter. I really appreciated so much. You have aa wonderful day.
Rainbow Kathy
re: re: re: ALWAYS TEST BLOOD SUGAR!
Gretchen Becker
Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 09:40 AMIf milk has too many carbs, then you don't drink milk. Or you substitute a low-carb milk called Calorie Countdown. If potatoes have too many carbs, you don't eat potatoes; you eat mashed cauliflower instead.
If you're using insulin, the best book is Richard Bernstein's Diabetes Solution, as it has a lot of information about using insulin as well as diet advice. I've helped to write another low-carb diet book called The Four Corners Diet. The book bombed, so you can get a used copy for less than $1.
Today there are lots of low-carb recipe sites on the Internet.
Anyone living in a retirement or nursing home and not preparing their own meals might have more difficulty following a low-carb diet.
-
Testing by type 2 diabetics
kiltyone
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 03:51 PMWell I don't know where these folks get their info. I have had type 2 for over 30 years and have never tested by blood glucose other than once a year at the doctors office. They never say nothing about it but its okay.
I sure ain't going to waste hundreds of dollars on testing supplies and carrying all that junk around all the time.
What do you get for it. Kinda like the people who take stuff for their fat in the blood all so they can live 5 months more.
Forget. Live life to the fullest, put all your faith in God and he will preserve you and your ways.
Afterall, He is the great healer and can do more than any doc.
-
knowledge is power
frankenduf
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 04:05 PMya gotta love people who assert that a black box system could possibly advance a patient's understanding of what is going on with their body- that being said, my pet peeve is the conscientious patients who religiously check their fasting sugars, even though they run normal- i would surmise that if somehow all the redundant fasting sugar checks were stopped (or at least bumped up to post prandial), the unused strips would stretch from here to china- i agree with your highlighting the usefulness of a temporary CGMS trial- i would specifically add that it is most useful for those who suffer from hypos to calibrate their lifestyle, viz: gastroparesis, Somogyi, and dawn phenomenonre: knowledge is power
Gretchen Becker
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 04:26 PMFrank I agree that if your BG has been 85 every morning for the past month, there's no point in continuing to test every day. But it's good to do spot checks, just to make sure the fasting numbers haven't been drifting up without you knowing it.
For a type 2 not on insulin or only on basal insulin who is getting consistent results, I think not testing for a while, stockpiling the strips, and then using those strips to test every hour or every couple of hours for a day or so makes more sense.
-
testing blood for type two diabetics
Alice
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 04:10 PMI am a type two diabetic. I test my blood once a day. I find it helpful, as if my sugar is up. I know what I ate and it helps my Doctor.
-
Self-testing is my denial buster
JeanV
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 04:50 PMWhen I test my fasting blood glucose each morning, it keeps me acutely aware of how well I am managing my diabetes. It also clues me in to other variables -- for example, if I know that my diet and exercise has been good, but I have suddenly have elevated readings, then I know to look for infections or other illness as a culprit. Am I coming down with the flu? Is that biopsy site becoming infected? Why am I getting an elevated reading?
Similarly, when I am vigorously exercising and I start to feel a bit whoozy, I can test my blood glucose and see that it's dropping too low and compensate with a small serving of carb-rich food, a few ounces of fruit juice, etc.
I can't imagine not knowing what's going on with my blood glucose between office visits. It would be like flying blind. What we need is more information, not less. I'd give anything for some kind of continuous monitoring device that would accurately clue me in instantly to the impact of my diet choices, my exercise choices, stress, illness, etc. If my pancreas and insulin receptors can no longer respond correctly in the moment, then it's my job to use my brain to step up and keep diabetic complications at bay by adjusting my diet, exercise, rest, hydration, stress-relief, etc. to protect myself from highs and lows.
re: Self-testing is my denial buster
justme
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 05:15 PMI agree with self-testing as a denial buster. Sometimes I try to guess my sugar and then test it . I am usually wrong. Another reason to test and keep your A1c at a good level is when you may be having surgery. I have a hysterectomy coming up and thank God , my levels are great. However I have a friend with high levels and they cancelled her surgery until she is under better control. It isn't worth the wait when you need the surgery as soon as possible like my friend and I do.
Good luck with your surgery
JeanV
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 05:37 PMI hope that you keep your sugars in the safe range before, during and after your hospital visit. Self-testing will help you stay in-range. The better your control, the faster you will heal and the less likely you'll get a wound infection (there are no guarantees, but still, good control greatly improves your chances.)
I recently discovered (much to my dismay) the dangers of any wound when blood glucose is too high. I had a biopsy to a lesion on my chest (skin only -- I have a history of melanoma) when my control was poor and it took FOREVER for the biopsy site to heal. Wounds that should take a week or less to pretty-much heal take many weeks to heal when blood glucose is chronically elevated.
Take care and best wishes for a full and fast recovery.
-
Type 2 Diabetes is NOT taken seriously enough!
jkirkman
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 05:21 PMHi!
I am a type 2 diabetic on intensive insulin therapy. I cannot believe the poo-pooing attitudes of people over type 2 and how they think, "Oh that's nothing, unless it's type1." If it really is nothing, then why did my blood sugars over time steadily climb up? Testing BY ALL means needs to be done at least four times a day for any diabetic. At least that's my opinion from my experience. Not allowing us "little" type 2's to test is ridiculous!
I have seen people on dialysis after having type 2 diabetes, and those that have let it all go, and experienced neuropathy as well. I have heard of A1C's jumping way up and beyond normal, (the way mine was,) and this isn't as serious as type 1? Come on, wake up! Us type 2's need to test often as well as adhering to a regime to stay healthier and free of complications!
re: re: Type 2 Diabetes is NOT taken seriously enough!
jkirkman
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 08:17 PMre: re: Type 2 Diabetes is NOT taken seriously enough!
tamigirlrocks
Friday, October 09, 2009 at 11:24 AMOh my, please tell me you are being sarcastic! I can handle sick humor, really. I am on an intense insulin regimen (type II) and I test to make sure I don't under/over shoot my insulin dose! Get a new doctor. My doc knows her stuff when it comes to diabetes and from what I read, I am one of the lucky ones.
A Godly life has nothing to do with it. God gave us free will and I suppose burying one's head in the sand is free will, but I shall use the brain that the good Lord gave me and test! Get your head out of the sand sister and let the holy spirit inside you lead you to your glucometer.
-
Nuts to them
Helen Mueller
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 07:56 PMI am becoming increasingly fed up with the medical establishment. Because the soonest my endo could see me was Jan 21 (post kidney removal, having issues with hypoparathyrodism, which she had been monitoring) I went to the NP. She quickly shifted the visit to my diabetes and gave me a hard time because my latest A1c was too LOW at 6.0 I got the same from the endo at my last visit. Hey, listen to me, I already have complications, I am not here to discuss my diabetes, let's get to my point. Alas, I know more about what I need to do than they do, so all I got out of the visit was more bloodwork. I can get that from my oncologist. I have no objections to NPs, but aren't they supposed to free up the doctor's time so they can consider the serious problems, and not the rechecks? As for a diabetes team, what's that?
Back to the point of your article, Gretchen, I am a type 2 on insulin. My behavior is inconsistent, especially when it comes to time, I test 4 times a day, sometimes 5. I no longer test at bedtime, the PP dinner gives me enough information. However, I do test in the morning, so I can judge how much insulin to take for my morning rise, or whether I should take no insulin at all. My nights vary from moderately bad to I would rather die than be like this, so my morning numbers respond to this.
I would love a cgm, even for a few days. However the one the endo offered would not give me the readings, they would go directly to their staff. Would anyone call if I am going low? This would be useless, I would have to journal my every minute and then tie it to the readout they give me. As you know, life gets in the way. However, since we are such a lucrative market, I think better cgms will come down the pike at lower prices and insurance companies will offer coverage on the machine and the supplies.
No more sarcasm. Thanks for all you do to educate diabetics, and that includes me.
Helen Mueller
re: Nuts to them
Gretchen Becker
Friday, October 09, 2009 at 10:17 AMHi Helen, Nice to "see you" here. I'm sorry you're getting such poor care from your health care people. It's very discouraging when they know less than we do about the disease. The NP who said your A1c was too low had obviously read that veteran's study in which they found that mortality was higher in older vets with lower A1cs. But the patients in the study had already had poor control for years, and their A1cs were lowered with lots of drugs. Other studies contradicted that one, but some people persist in believing it.
Like physicians, some NPs are great, but others are mediocre. I know one who refused to give insulin to a woman who turned out to have LADA and whose A1cs kept going up and up on oral drugs.
So it's sad that we have to take charge of our own health, but unfortunately, that's currently true. Internet communication like this site and e-mail lists can be a big help with that, as you know.
I agree that the CGMs will come down in price eventually. Have you had a C-peptide test recently? If your C-peptide is low, Medicare would pay for a CGM if you're on Medicare.
re: Nuts to them
CathWren
Monday, October 12, 2009 at 01:19 PMre: re: Nuts to them
Helen Mueller
Monday, October 12, 2009 at 02:48 PMAs near as I can tell, once you hit 70+, fear of lows, possibly leading to a coma, become the leading factor in how much to control. What? Did my ability to read my meter, suddenly disappear? Obviously I disagree. As I am new to you, you don't know about all my cancers over the last year and a half, and the difficulty in getting treatment for the kidney ones, without losing kidney function. My A1c about a year ago was 5.7, my personal best 5.5. My goal is simply to get back to where I was.
Keep on testing, if nothing else, our meters are a reminder to take care of ourselves.
Helen Mueller
I am registered here, and the other day I ran across the information, right where I had filed it! Imagine that. So I think I will begin signing in and not have to sign e-mails.
-
Type 2 Diabetics should test everyday.
gopalen
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 08:14 PMThe usefulness of self testing can only be understood by those who test regularly and modify their diet by experimenting with different foods. This can have a great impact on the mental health of the person who can visibly see the effects of her or his efforts to control the glucose level in blood by the experiments.
-
should type two Diabetics test for thier blood sugar?
rainbowdancer69
Thursday, October 08, 2009 at 08:24 PMI'm a veteran with type -two Diabetes. The Doctors at the VA Hospitial tell me we are allowed frre strips enough to check our blood sugars one tiome a week!! What Idots
I check my sugar twice a day morning and night and sometimes I feel thats not enough. Even Type two Dieabetics have trouble with their Blood shooting up and down.
I missed a meal and forgot to check my sugar one lunch time about a year ago and ended passing out in my dinning room. Lucky my wife was there and put sugar under my tonuge. I urge every type two dieabetic to eat three meals a day at approximately the same times each day and check your sugar at least twice a day Morning and night.
even my outside Diabetes Doctor agrees. It helps you regulte your food intake as well as what you eat. Some foods drive your sugar wild so you have to learn what and how much to eat and control your sugar so you need to check your sugar and control your sugar better by checking it. Your sugar can change when taking medicines for other problems and you have to watch it while taking medicine even for colds.
So its my opinion that these oeople telling you you donot need to check your sugars are stupid and need to stop killing people.
Steven Landers
-
Blood Glucose testing in Diabetes Type II
Anonymous
Friday, October 09, 2009 at 12:20 AMI am a type II diabetic for 11 years. I controlled it for 10 years by diet alone. For
the past few months I have been taking a pill. First I was on Metformin, but it didn't
agree with me, and now am on Amaryl 4 mg. I brought my A1C down to 5.4 from 6.7.
I have to be careful of hypoglycemia, but a little sweets and I am fine. My M.D.
considers me in excellent control. I usually check 4 times a day.
-
To All
Gretchen Becker
Friday, October 09, 2009 at 10:21 AMThanks for all the comments. I think the volume of comments suggests that there's a real need for more informed patient education in this country rather than telling type 2s to "watch your diet" or "eat healthy."
We need more studies of the costs of patient care in patients who take charge, test a lot, and modify their diet and exercise as a result of what they see on their meters, vs those who just take pills and keep eating as they always have. One thing that insurers pay attention to is the costs of treatment. Proving that those who take control cost a lot less might have more impact than our verbiage.
We also need more creative programs to teach people who lack the skills to educate themselves.
Most people trust their doctors and believe whatever they say, so we also need programs to educate physicians about type 2.
-
Use way to test is important too
CathWren
Monday, October 12, 2009 at 01:12 PMI wonder if the results of the study saying testing wasn't effective was because the participants were only told to test am and pre-meal. My doctor doesn't seem concerned about post-meal testing. Presumably that is so I know how much or how few carbs to have though since I'm not on insulin, I'm not sure how important that is. If I was told why, I was still in too much shock to retain the info.
I wonder, too, about the severity or level of control of the participants' the diabetes. Mine is mild and easily controled by Metformin. My friend's A1Cs are much higher and under much less control.
Finally, while it is true that seeing higher numbers could lead to depression, seeing lower number could do the reverse. My friend was quite excited the other day when his 2-hour post meal test was 127 and encouraged to continue his successful efforts.
re: the way to test is important too
JG
Monday, October 12, 2009 at 06:25 PMRight you are that seeing an improvement in your BG numbers is uplifting and makes explicit the fact that you can make a big difference in controlling your diabetes AND makes you try harder to reach that goal. In other words- IF you know you can make a difference you will try much harder to do so!
I think testing one's BG several hours after dinner, ie. just before going to bed is important, since it tells you what impact your main meal (ie dinner) has on your BG AND also that BG level will
very likely be with you the whole night...til morn breakfast.
-
Glucose meter testing.
Terri
Saturday, October 24, 2009 at 11:19 AMBy taking my blood glucose levels ,I am better able to see what the effects of new foods have on my levels. I would feel so totally lost if it weren't for testing. When I slip, I am reminded by the test that I need to get back on track. I am also suprised by some of the results. I find that some combinations of food actually work better for me. GOD BLESS test strips. They also let me know when I need to change the dosage of my Insulin.
- Font size
- Email This
- Bookmark
- Thank you for your input
- Save
- RSS
- Report Abuse











I agree with your assessment. I use the continuous meter with the graph screen to figure out how long it takes for different insulin's to starts to lower my BG, how long they last till their effects levels off, and how much insulin I need before getting dangerously to low. No doctor can figure this out so precisely. Many of the doctors do not even understand how we can take advantage of the continuous meter. I also discovered that some foods do raise my BG very fast and some foods that should be bad are not as bad, for example, a potato kugel raised my BG very moderately, I still have to repeat this experiment to be sure. I hope that soon our continuous blood sugars will be able to be displayed on the IPhone screens, and transmitted to our doctors via the cell phone .