Sign in

or Register now

MyDiabetesCentral.com

See all of our health sites at www.HealthCentral.com
Sunday, October, 12, 2008

KT: Mother, Entrepreneur, Diabetes Advocate

by  Amy Tenderich
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Amy Tenderich
Amy Tenderich
Close
Diabetes Mine creator

Learn a little, laugh a little with Amy Tenderich of Diabetes...

Amy Tenderich

Recent Posts:
View All
Subscribe

But those were also days when the medical dogma was no glucose at all for people with diabetes.  They were told they should eat maltitol (sugar alcohols) instead, which cause diarrhea and stomach cramps.  We always incorporated some natural glucose into her diet.  We incorporated dessert into the carb count.  In fact, she got "shot treats" -- we put candies in jars, labeled 2, 3 or 4g carb.  She could have any combination up to 6g, but no more.

Basically, our was goal to teach Nicola everything we knew about diabetes, the underpinnings and the science.  We figured, "it's a huge thing that effects your life. We need to focus on it now, so that later we don't have to..."


Did you get involved with ADA right away?  Most parents seem directly drawn to the JDRF.

I had just recently left field of diabetes to focus on osteoporosis.  But with a little child it's very, very hard.  Everyone controls what they can control.  I felt felt drawn back to diabetes, so I revved up my professional membership in ADA, and went to their annual conference. 

I told an NIH scientist about my feelings, and he said, why don't you volunteer for the ADA?  Having a scientist involved on the advocacy side is rare.  So we started doing the fundraising walk, and the first year we raised $1000, then the second year $4000, and so on.  I got a call asking me to set up a chapter on the San Francisco Peninsula in 1996.

I know many parents drawn are drawn to JDRF, and they do great work.  But it is short-sighted to think that Type 2 doesn't have important relevance for Type 1 diabetes and and vice-versa.  Scientifically, they can benefit from many of the same discoveries. 

The ADA sets the standard for diabetes care in this country, and they have a legal advocacy group that interfaces with the police, the prison system, etc. They lobby Congress to help diabetics get pilot's licenses, truck driver's licenses, and to secure research funds.  Here in California they just won an important victory with the School Nurse Association.  That group has finally agreed that non-medical professionals can help treat diabetic children in school. Before, it had to be a school nurse, but there are virtually no school nurses anymore.  The ADA finally brokered a settlement.

The other aspect is professional education. The ADA offers seminars, post-graduate courses, etc., and this is very important because the level of understanding of diabetes in the medical profession is not where it should be.  The ADA has dedicated itself to being advocates, providing education, and funding research.  They just have a bigger scope overall.

When kids experience discrimination in school, the JDRF sends the families to the ADA for help. JDRF does participate, by submitting supporting briefs for example, but they don't take on litigation themselves. Their focus is on the research and the cure.  Meanwhile, we live with diabetes and live with discrimination.  People have diabetes today, and they need help today. 


You're also now on the Board of Directors of the ADA Research Foundation, which has been criticized for not putting the funding dollars in the right place.  In brief, how does that group function?

The priorities are set by the physicians who advise the ADA, using rigorous, scientific guidelines provided by thought leaders.  As board members, we raise the money.   

I'm actually new to this role -- I'll have my first meeting in May. In the meantime I'm making phone calls.  And I put my money where my mouth is.  We gave a major gift ourselves the last few years.

I'd say the projects are split 50/50 between Type 1 and Type 2.  But the reality is, most research is relevant to both -- the process of complications, insulin resistance, the alterations of the pancreas that take place in Type 2, which are also very important to understanding Type 1, for example.


How does your passion for these advancements translate into your work at Kyphon?

I met a surgeon who conceived of an operation to address fractures of the spine caused by osteoporosis. Before that, treatment was painkillers and physical therapy.  There are enormous health consequences, leading to spinal deformity, caused by actual fractures of the bone in the spine. This is what causes people to bend forward (Dowager's hump), and it's much more painful than generally recognized.

The surgeon had invented an elegant procedure whereby you insert two tiny balloons from the back into the bones that are crushed.  You inflate the balloons with liquid, which compacts the inner soft destroyed bone, and you can see the whole shape of bone moving back toward normal.  They you can fill the space with a liquid plastic that hardens. It's all done through two little straws -- very minimally invasive. This is called Kyphoplasty.   

I ran Kyphon for five years before it was bought by Medtronic last year.  It was exciting and scary, very different -- whereas the emotional part of a disease is very difficult. It's hard to accept.  You try to put it in the background so you can go on and live your life. 


What diabetes technologies or treatments or advances toward a cure look most promising to you -- let's say to be realized in the next 5-10 years?

I don't know of anything I'd be confident to say will be ready 5-10 years from now that's really meaningful.

After Nicola was diagnosed, I called a couple of tremendous physicians and researchers I knew to let them know, and they said, "we'll have islet cell transplantation 10 years from now."  I said that knowing the complexity of the disease, it's not going to happen.

I don't want people to give up hope because every day we're learning more about the cells that make insulin, how to potentially make those cells, how to keep alive when they're to put into people.  People are working on it day and night. The big issue is, how safe is this?  We have to go slowly to be sure it works and works well. It's very complex, there are lots of problems to solve. That's why it's taking time.


So as a health executive and also an effected mother, what would you say to other parents of children with Type 1 at this juncture in time?

I'm grateful for every single thing that's being done right now to help make it easier for people with diabetes to get through the day safely with good blood glucose control. 

Every parent has their way and their philosoph

 

Like what you're reading? Get email notifications when Amy Tenderich posts, or get updates on Facebook, iGoogle, your personal blog and more!

Ask a Question

Get answers from our experts and community members.

Answer a Question

67 yr old female sometimes weak & Shaky for no apparent reason is diabetes a possibility

Answer This View all questions >
Free Newsletter
Get weekly updates, news alerts and more on Diabetes and related health conditions.