WEDNESDAY, Aug. 8 (HealthDay News) -- The debate over the
heart-attack risks posed by the
In a study published June 14 in the
New England Journal of Medicine, heart expert Dr. Steven E.
Nissen, chairman of the Cleveland Clinic's department of
However, a new analysis of that same data finds no proof of a
significant risk of
"We don't have sufficient data to adjudicate the association of rosiglitazone with increased cardiovascular risk," said lead researcher Dr. Sanjay Kaul, a cardiologist and professor of medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles. "The data that was analyzed does not allow us to conclude definitively whether the risk of heart attack with rosiglitazone is increased or decreased."
Kaul, who published his findings online Aug. 7 in Annals of Internal Medicine, and his colleagues reexamined the same trials that Nissen had used in his study. Kaul said he found that Nissen's analysis excluded trials that should have been included -- trials that would have lowered the risk of heart attack because none occurred.
In addition, Kaul said, those trials weren't designed to assess
the
To really answer the question about the potential heart risks associated with Avandia, there needs to be long-term trials specifically designed to see if the drug increases the chances of heart attack, Kaul said.
In response to Nissen's study, the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration convened an expert panel in July to consider the
heart-attack risk associated with Avandia. The panel recommended
that the drug be kept on the market, but that a warning be attached
that there may be an increased risk of heart attack. Avandia has
already been linked to an increased risk of


















