Wednesday, February 15, 2012

The Politics of Prevention

Chronic diseases are the leading causes of death and disability in the United States. This is information straight from those in the know: the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. And by talking about chronic diseases, we are talking about such notables as diabetes, cancer and heart disease.

 

The prevention of chronic disease may well be the most realistic and effective way to control the ever-expanding cost of health care (with the added perk of improving our own lives along the way). I believe that the acceptance and adoption of a healthier lifestyle, at both an individual as well as a global level, is the missing link in our national healthcare crisis.

 

I believe that each of us has the power to stop, and even reverse, the upwardly moving national trends of obesity and related chronic disease(s). I believe that it is well within our power to do this for ourselves but I also believe that our government can do more to help, particularly for those who lack the resources to fully engage on their own.

 

Our current system is one that is based on fixing what's broken, rather than preventing the damage in the first place. This is completely backwards. Doesn't it make much more sense to use that proverbial "ounce of prevention" to save yourself the trouble (and expense) of the "pound of cure?"

 

While chronic diseases are among the most common and expensive health issues we as a nation face, the good news is that many of these conditions are also among the most preventable. Adopting healthy behaviors such as eating more nutritious foods while minimizing the junk, being more physically active, not smoking, etc. is definitely the place to start.

 

We are in quite the predicament: As rates of obesity and chronic disease skyrocket, our medical system is in full decay. Not a good combo, no sir. I would like to know what our political candidates intend to do, in real time and in a realistic manner, to assist in reversing this multifactorial breakdown.

 

What the government should be thinking about is helping out on both ends of the spectrum: engaging the medical community to enliven this mission and empowering the American people to take individual and community action.

 

Some of the issues at hand that the government can (and should) have a role in include:

 

The cost of healthy foods

It is often much, much more expensive to eat fresh (particularly organic) vegetables and fruit, lean cuts of meat and fish than it is to grab highly processed and nutritionally inadequate choices.

 

The accessibility and availability of healthy foods

In addition to the direct cost of food, there is the time cost as well. Everyone wants to save a little time. Convenience is at a premium.

 

It seems so much easier and more convenient to grab take-out from the corner fast food restaurant (on every corner) than to spend more time preparing a whole food meal or seeking out a healthy dining out alternative.

Ask a Question

Get answers from our experts and community members.

Btn_ask_question_med
View all questions (2130) >