Vasectomy and Vasovasostomy - Reversal Surgery

Success rates are higher for repairing obstructions closer to the testicles because the epididymis is wider in this area. In general, pregnancy rates are around 25%, but higher rates have been reported. In one 2002 study of men who had vasectomy reversal more than 15 years after the original procedure, 62% required vasoepididymostomy, and the overall pregnancy rate was 43%. Pregnancy rates ranged from 49% in those who had had their vasectomy 15 to19 years earlier to 25% in those who had the surgery 25 or more years before, with the highest rates occurring, not surprisingly, in those with the youngest wives.

text continues below

Damage in other ducts and small tubes are a major reason for vasoepididymostomy failure. Ultrasound before the operation may be valuable to determine if these abnormalities exist, which would make it unlikely that the procedure would be successful.

If an initial vasoepididymostomy fails but conditions are favorable, a repeat procedure may still succeed. In a small 1999 study, two-thirds of men who had repeat vasoepididymostomy had sperm in their semen, and natural conception occurred in 25% of patients (3 out of 12) within 18 months.

Freezing Sperm Before a Reversal Surgeries

If the patient did not contribute sperm for freezing and banking before vasectomy, some doctors suggest freezing sperm obtained during vasovasostomy as insurance against failure. Such sperm can be used in assisted reproductive methods later on if natural intercourse fails to achieve pregnancy.

There is some controversy, however, surrounding routine use of frozen sperm before a vasovasostomy. One study reported that so many sperm were non-motile at the time of the reversal surgery that freezing sperm obtained during the procedure provided little benefit. Nevertheless, new fertilization techniques are using even non-motile sperm with some success. And other studies have reported some successful pregnancies with frozen sperm. Some experts recommend routine sperm retrieval only for men undergoing bilateral vasovasostomy (those performed on both sides) and possibly for men who are having vasovasostomy with vasoepididymostomy. Men should discuss these options with their doctor.

Reversal Surgery Versus Assisted Reproductive Technologies

Even though newer techniques such as ICSI are improving pregnancy rates after vasectomy, vasovasostomy is still a better choice than assisted reproductive technologies (ART) for most men who want children.

Success rates with reversal surgeries are improving and the costs are lower than with ART. In addition, a vasovasostomy does not pose a risk for multiple births. In one study, the pregnancy rate for vasovasostomy was 52%, whereas success after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was between 25% and 30% (ICSI is the ART treatment of choice for men who have had vasectomy.). Even for men who have failed vasovasostomy, a repeat procedure appears to be less expensive than embarking on fertility treatments at that time.

ART may, however, be a better approach than reversal for men with evidence of anti-sperm autoantibodies due to vasectomy. ICSI may also be more effective than reversal surgeries in men whose vasectomy was conducted at least 15 years or more beforehand.