Reply to an Answer

In response to:

Yes, it was his "moral obligation" to tell you if he knew he had herpes, but no, you cannot use his lack of conscientiousness to sue him.. there are some laws on the books in a number of states regarding intentional AIDS transmission but not herpes, which is not considered a "life threatening condition." I hope at minimum you will always use a condom when engaging in sexual intercourse and know the history of future contacts - which may unfortunately mean asking them to be tested before you have oral or traditional sex.

Subject:

Comment:

Display Name:

Note: This Display Name will be publicly visible on your SharePosts, your profile on this site, and the rest of the Internet. To maintain your anonymity do not include personally identifiable information (such as your name or email address) in your Display Name, SharePosts, or any other public postings on our site.

Role:

Email Address:

Password:

Confirm password:

Type the letters shown in the box to the right:

Accept Our Terms of Service

Please send me news updates, top features and
highlights via the HerpesConnection.com newsletter.
View sample.

Email:

Password:

Remember Me:

Note: All clinical content on this site is physician-reviewed, except material generated by our community members.

Featuring Content From:

By using this service, you accept our Terms of Use. Please read them. The consumer health information on HerpesConnection.com is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for medical advice or treatment for any medical conditions. You should promptly seek professional medical care if you have any concern about your health, and you should always consult your physician before starting a fitness regimen. Copyright © 2005-2009. The HealthCentral Network, Inc. All rights reserved.

We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.

Sign in

HerpesConnection.com

Reply to an Answer