Sign in

or Register now

MyHeartCentral.com

See all of our health sites at www.HealthCentral.com
Monday, November, 30, 2009
  • Font size

Heart Disease Prevention + Treatment: Get the Right Tests and Know Your Options

HeartHawk
HeartHawk
Close
HeartHawk is Blogging on HeartCentral
Heart Health Consumer Advocate

I am a numbers guy, an engineer, MBA, and for the real numbers geeks,...

HeartHawk

Sunday, August 24, 2008
View All of HeartHawk's Posts
I remember when I was first introduced to the concept of heart plaque.  I thought, "Plaque, isn't that the stuff on your teeth?" Since then I have had the pleasure of becoming acquainted with pioneering heart disease prevention and reversal like cardiologists Dr. William Davis and Dr. Bill Blanc...
  1. Untitled Comment
    Sue
    Tuesday, August 26, 2008 at 02:30 PM

    Thanks for this important post HeartHawk.  Here's a question I pose to you and the rest of the community.  Why don't these Heart Scans happen as part of the normal course of diagnosis if they are considered capable of determining heart disease?  Is it an insurance issue? Do some doctors do this more than others, say regionally?  Or is it happening now but infrequently and patients must ask for this from their doctors?

     

    Sounds like this is a big breakthough in determining whether you could be facing a heart attack or stroke.  I say get on the bandwagon and start scanning!

     

    All the best, sue (moderator)

    Reply
    re: Untitled Comment
    HeartHawk
    Tuesday, August 26, 2008 at 07:48 PM

    Sue:

     

    Thanks for the comment.  There are several reasons why heart scanning has not been widely adopted.  Some are understandable.  Others are downright evil.

     

    1. Doctors tend to be extremely conservative.  They are generally unwilling to change their practice until many large and long outcome based trials are held, even if the observation is common sense.

     

    2.  It takes at least seven years to get through med school, internship and residency.  They are therefore typically seven years behind the curve.

     

    3. Medical science is advancing at a breakneck speed.  Given all there is to learn and know it is somewhat unreasonable to expect docs to keep abreast of everything.  But here is where the reasons begin to turn nasty.  Some docs are just plain lazy!  It is a lot of work to stay current.

     

    4. Many docs and hospitals have invested heavily in the "fix" mode as opposed to the "prevent" mode.  There is a great deal of money to be made in putting stents in clogged arteries.  That income goes away if fewer people get that sick.  Also, how are the hospital execs going to pay for all those shiny new cath labs.  When you hear even young docs complain they have to "find ways to do more procedures" you begin to understand the depth of the problem - and the greed before good philosophy.

     

    5. It takes a tremendous ego to stay effective in "life and death decision" occupations and that ego must be fed.  That is not necessarily a bad thing.  It can get ugly though when docs are caught up in situations where they derive their self-worth in pulling lives back from the brink of death.  It is not as rewarding to devote your existence to the mundane task of keeping people healthy so they won't need death-defying performances from the docs.

     

    The good news is we are winning.  It is just very slow.  At some point the insurance companies and lawyers will determine prevention is cheaper and the pace will accelerate.  Check out these articles I wrote for Track Your Plaque.

     

    Major Malpractice Class Action Lawsuit Looms for Doctors Who Ignore Heart Scans

     

    The Bankrupting of American Healthcare: $20 Billion, Many Lives Lost Each Year

      

    Regards,

     

     

    HeartHawk

    Reply
  • Font size
  • Bookmark
  • Thank you for your input
  • Save
  • RSS
  • Report Abuse

Ask a Question

Get answers from our experts and community members.

View all questions (3712) >