A few weeks ago the National Institutes of Health (NIH) held their much-anticipated State-Of-The-Science Conference on the Prevention of Urinary and Fecal Incontinence in Adults. I mentioned the conference briefly in my SharePost: "Do I Have Incontinence?", but I thought this week I would...


I want to make a suggestion about how to talk about incontinence, and share an observation.
Suggestion: rather than asking about whether someone is "incontinent",
"Do you experience urine leakage?"
is a much clearer question (and also a less threatening question).
Also relevant to the conference, I think, is this observation:
In my local (chain) bookstore, books on health conditions are listed alphabetically--but incont is only part of "Aging"! This is three problems:
1) incont should be alphabetical like every other condition, (near "insomnia" and "irritable bowel")
2) if they insist on putting incont in a subsection (maybe it's necessary), but why does that subsection have to be "Aging"???
3) They had no books on incontinence in stock.
I can't speak for anyone else, but I would probably feel more willing to talk about my incont if the diveristy of ages and causes were more widely recognized. This relates to the conference, it seems: the prevalence of incont, how incont is perceived, and people's willingness to say that they experience incontinence.
Matthew
The bookstore "aging" mistake may have been unique to that store, I've not seen it since. Though whenever I go to bookstores I oftnen check, and finfidng a book in stock seems to still be a problem....