Sign in

or Register now

MultipleSclerosisCentral.com

See all of our health sites at www.HealthCentral.com
Thursday, December, 03, 2009
  • Font size
Receive a FREE Osteoarthritis of the knee pamphlet. Start here.

Merely Me's MS Central Question of the Week!

Merely Me
Merely Me
Close
I am a mother, a writer, and now an MS patient

I just got diagnosed with MS in October of 2007 although my very...

Merely Me

Thursday, August 20, 2009
View All of Merely Me's Posts
Hi everybody!   First of all...I want to just say thank you to everyone on this site who shares in creating community here.  I feel guilty because I have become very neglectful lately in participating more fully here as I would like to.  I feel that I am definitely receiving more sup...
  1. Public option
    LVK
    Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 07:02 PM

    Without the public option, I either get a divorce or my American husband never lives in the US again. We're in Canada where my diagnosis and treatment has cost us about $200 out of pocket in cab fare to get to the hospital over the past year. Under any of the schemes I've heard, we'd still be on the hook for thousands of dollars a year.

     

    There will never be a comprehensive health care plan for the US as long as there is a profit motive driving every discussion. There will never be a comprehensive health care plan as long as more than a third of the voting public in the US doesn't know that Medicare is a government program.

     

    http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/08/poll-republicans-think-government-should-stay-out-of-medicare.php

    Reply
    re: Public option
    Lisa Emrich
    Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 08:51 PM

    I asked an MS blogger to explain how her access to care within the Canadian system works.  The detailed information she provided was extremely thorough and clear.  Made me wish for such simplicity and coverage.  Her post can be found here.

    Reply
    re: Public option
    Kathy
    Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 09:23 PM

    I have a friend in other web site she has waited 2 years and still waiting for a MRI to tell the DR. for sure she has MS. they will not put her on meds for it till than. She is know in a wheelchair and still waiting

    Reply
    re: re: Public option
    LVK
    Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 09:32 PM

    Is she in Canada?

     

    I simply had numb hands and a wonky left knee, I got an MRI on a non-emergency basis in 6 years. Waiting two years for an MRI to diagnose anything neurological is unheard of, unless she's in the far North and won't fly to get one.

    Reply
    re: re: re: Public option
    LVK
    Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 09:48 PM

    I mean 6 WEEKS. Not years.

     

    Gah.

    Reply
    re: re: re: re: Public option
    Merely Me
    Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 09:49 PM

    LOL I read that and was wondering!  Smile  six years is a long time!

    Reply
    re: re: re: re: re: Public option
    LVK
    Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 10:48 PM

    I had years on the brain. It was just such an outrageous claim.

     

    My 70 y.o  grandmother didn't wait two years to get an MRI on her elbow... which turned out to be nothing but arthritis.

     

    My kingdom for an edit button!

    Reply
    re: Public option
    Merely Me
    Saturday, August 22, 2009 at 11:35 AM

    LVK...I appreciate your insights.  What do you predict is going to happen with the health care reform proposal?  What do people in Canada think about the American health care system? 

    Reply
  2. Leave It Alone
    KJ
    Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 08:47 PM

    I've been under military health care, the German system, and a couple of different US HMOs and health spending accounts. My wife escaped from Czechoslovakia and obviously experienced the true Socialist/Communist health care system as well. My mom and my previous wife were both registered nurses, one in the US and one in Europe. Right now I'm getting free treatment from the Veterans Administration for anything considered "service connected", but I have to use my private insurance for everything else and for the rest of the family. With all this experience I have to say that I prefer the basic US system as it exists right now. It's not perfect but it works well enough. From what I've heard about 80-85% of American's are satisfied with their current coverage.

     

    There have been times in my life when I've had no insurance (my choice) and times when I've paid extra for very comprehensive care. I've never feared that I wouldn't be treated if I needed treatment but I like the feeling of being individually responsible for choosing my care.

     

    I also like the fact that our system IS profit based. I think this works to the favor of the consumer, not against us. Just like with other products and services some providers go the expensive route and give excellent care but charge an arm and a leg, others are more discount and go for volume, still others represent "niche" or specialty markets. As it is there is a good deal of competition for business. I'm afraid we would lose that under a government-run system. I would hate to see our health-care system become one big monopoly.

    Reply
    re: Leave It Alone
    Merely Me
    Saturday, August 22, 2009 at 11:39 AM

    KJ...I really appreciate hearing your side of things and presented in such an articulate manner. 

     

    What do you think is the future of health care here in the states?  What do you think is going to happen? 

     

    And...how have you personally nagivated the insurance maze here?  Do you have any personal stories about the efforts in getting medical services, tests, or treatments? 

     

    We always love hearing from you!

    Reply
    re: re: Leave It Alone
    KJ
    Saturday, August 22, 2009 at 05:35 PM

    Hi!

     

    I don't like the way the debate over health care is going. There is more fundamentally at stake with all this than just improving the quality or cost of medical care. It comes down to basic freedoms and rights. I believe in minimal government interference or involvement in my life. It disturbs me to no end that people expect the government to take care of all their problems while being suspicious of private companies.

     

    Let me tell you about the experience of my previous wife. She was born in Germany with a hole in her heart (ventricular septal defect). She underwent surgeries as an infant in Europe for her problems under the German health care system (Krankenkasse) but the surgeries were only partly successful and she was left with severe heart problems. Under the German system her health care was free, but limited. She received good educational benefits, job training and placement, etc. Eventually she became a registered nurse.

     

    Probably against her better judgement she married me and moved to the US. I was working for $5.10/hour as a security guard at a factory and receiving basic HMO medical coverage through my employer with a fairly small deductable as I recall. Almost as soon as she got to the States she was put on a list for a complete heart and lung transplant (something her insurance would never consider her for in Germany). All of this was through my cheapo health plan. Unfortunately my wife became ill and died before a heart/lung donor could be found, four years after arriving in the US. (It would have cost us a $20 co-pay for the surgery plus a little for the medication.) Remember that this was a pre-existing condition. Oh those heartless, greedy, selfish private insurers and big pharmaceutical companies!

    Reply
    re: re: Leave It Alone
    KJ
    Sunday, August 23, 2009 at 02:47 PM

    Here's another example of government-run medical care.

     

    My present wife escaped from Czechoslovakia in the early 1980's. (I guess I have an affinity for European women.) She received asylum in Austria and eventually came to the US and became a naturalized citizen.

     

    In Czechoslovakia there was universal, government-run, medical care. Standards of care were good (better than in Cuba and the Soviet Union), the hospitals were modern, and the doctors educated and well paid. Unfortunately, like here, someone (like the State) had to pay the doctors' salaries, purchase the medicine and supplies, and build and maintain the hospitals. There isn't an unlimited amount of funding for this so the result is "rationed" care. If you were a member of the Communist Party you were much more privileged than the average citizen. For regular people, medical care and medications were limited.

     

    The above problem of rationed care was not as much of a problem for my future wife because she was a hairdresser. Why, in heaven's name, would that make a difference???? Two reasons - First, she provided a service that was also in high demand and not very available (the government severely limited private industry and she effectively worked at a "State" beauty shop, with State mandated hours and set prices.) It did however give her an opportunity to barter her services for medical care. (A couple of after-hours hair cuts = a bottle of heart pills for grandpa.) Second, she earned tips. This was money that the government couldn't easily track and which allowed her to pay "under-the-table" for goods and services in short supply (like medical care). This shows the unethical and downright corrupt practices that stem from a state-run system.

     

    Is the US headed to the above type of system? I'm not going to say it is or isn't, but we have to consider the long-term effects of government involvement in private industry. How will the various House and Senate plans effect medical care here in one, ten, or 50 years from now? Let's consider this carefully before jumping right into something.

    Reply
    re: Leave It Alone
    Unsure
    Wednesday, August 26, 2009 at 04:52 PM

    I cannot get any coverage due to pre-existing conditions.

    Reply
    re: re: Leave It Alone
    Merely Me
    Wednesday, August 26, 2009 at 04:57 PM

    Hi Unsure

     

    Can you tell us more about your experience with our health care system?  I want to hear your story!

    Reply
  3. HealthCare
    Kathy
    Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 09:19 PM

    I watch are President when he was in CO.and told my husband that I don't think he knows what that 1000 page bill is about. But when I was in Co. for two months (which I just got home } The Doctor for which my sister works for and has been Elect.To stand on the board to review this bill.Stated that if it passes we all will be in trouble for the one big???? it states in there that when you turn 65 you will be concel on death, because after 70 you will not have any health covage. I know that health care is outrages and something needs to be done but to have the Goverment run it no thanks

    Reply
    re: HealthCare
    LVK
    Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 09:38 PM

    The bill states no such thing. It simply covers the costs of counselling for end of life issues (powers of attorney, living wills, DNR orders, etc.) and covers you until you die... of whatever kills you. An anvil falling from a building or old age, you'll have coverage until you don't need it anymore.

     

    I'm Canadian for crying out loud! Why do I know more about the contents of the FOUR current bills before congress than Americans do?

    Reply
    re: HealthCare
    tellnhelen
    Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 10:21 PM

    Don't buy the hype.  Many people speaking the loudest seem to have agendas.  Either they ar e not telling the whole story clearly or thet don't understand the proposed bill or they are just not telling the truth.  In the President's case I believe he can't be but so specific because the legislation has not been completely written to he tries to stick with the principles.  Others seem to prey upon fears and concerns rather than try to reach sone trype of concensus. This leads me to feel that they have"agendas" that have little to do with healthcare

    Reply
    re: re: HealthCare
    Kathy
    Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 11:12 PM

    I have sick gut feeling. On this bill and that is all I am going say on this anymore here. And I want to thank you

    Reply
    re: HealthCare
    Merely Me
    Saturday, August 22, 2009 at 11:43 AM

    Hi Kathy!

     

    I do thank you for expressing your views here.  I think there are a lot of people who are worried about these proposed reforms.  What is your greatest fear with these potential changes to our health care system?  And what sources of information are you using to learn more about these changes? 

     

    I would love to hear more from you about your concerns and worries.

    Reply
    re: re: HealthCare
    Kathy
    Sunday, August 23, 2009 at 02:46 AM

    My concerns is what funding will be there for us. I just lost my Wal mart Ins because I have been on leave for a year I can go cobra but it will cost me 400.00 mo. I am on my husbend Ins but it is not as good. Also My husband and my daught both work for a small town hospital. The hospital had a meeting and stated it this bill goes through that this hospital and all small town hospital will close that means more people lose there job and health care.I do not want to be on a Gov. run Ins.What is really funny is back in 1995 we live in ILL and the people next to use said that Americans are dump they where from Romaina but they said that the Goverment is takeing over and this land will end up comminess and it will be done fast. When I hear people being arrest for bible study done in ther home in ca. and watch and see are right taking away slowy it scears me. All I can do and said Lord come get us. I don't trust Oboma at all he scareds me. and one BIG QUESTION I HAVE FOR US WITH MS. MISS OBOMA FATHER DIED FROM MS YOU WOULD THINK SHE WOULD SAY SOMETHING MAKE IT HER CAUSS .HER KIDS COULD END UP WITH IT THEY DON'T KNOW FOR SURE IF IT IS HERITY OR NOT.AND THAT IS MY CONCERN

    Reply
  4. Obama and Health Care
    Anonymous
    Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 09:32 PM

    Embarassed I am really not sure what his issues stand as far as health care.I do not read the newspaper every since I quit working as a dispather for JSO.Horrible is the day of those people.We do not tell the general public things that happen that are so horrible.That you cannot even speak the words.

     I quit 6 months later .I had to because I had a 3 year old at the time.And they switched our hours to include 12 hour shifts.No money for a baby sitter.I raised my 3 daughters on a pitance.I am not sure how I did it.And to this day I am not sure that the only way that I did was just eating what ever food was on the plate my children could not finish.And the belief in God.

    Well here I go again.Getting off of the subject.What are his policies on health care?

    Reply
    re: Obama and Health Care
    LVK
    Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 09:46 PM

    http://usliberals.about.com/od/healthcare/a/Obamahealthinsurreform.htm

     

    In short:

     

    No Pre-Existing Conditions to Exclude Coverage

    Will Cap Out-of-Pocket Expenses Annually

    No Lifetime Caps for Health Care Coverage

    No Dropping Coverage Due to Serious Illness

    No Gender Discrimination

    100% Coverage for Check-Ups, Preventive Health Care

    Coverage for Young Adults

    Guaranteed Insurance Renewal

     

    But read the about.com article. It's short and consise.

     

    Reply
    re: Obama and Health Care
    Merely Me
    Saturday, August 22, 2009 at 11:46 AM

    Hi there!

     

    I think perhaps a lot of other people are in the same boat of not knowing exactly what this proposal entails.  So Health Central has provided that information for you.  Just follow this link to download the bill to read for yourself.

     

    Thanks LVK for the information you have given!

    Reply
  5. I am not afraid
    tellnhelen
    Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 10:04 PM

    I am in favor of all of the principles listed.  I am also in favor of a public option.  I am unsure of how the actual legislation/regs will play out but I am not afraid.  It has be better for most of us than what exist now.  It will certainly be better (and cheaper over time) for the country as a whole to have healthy people.

     

    Thank you Merely..I thought you would never ask about health care.  I hope the readers here won't buy intro the drama I've seen on TV.  Nothing is going to be perfect but I feel confident that it's going to be better.../my humble opinion

     

     

    Reply
    re: I am not afraid
    Merely Me
    Saturday, August 22, 2009 at 11:51 AM

    Hi there!

     

    I am so glad you came to share your views on this very important topic which affects us all.

     

    I do believe that fear is a predominant emotion being expressed by a lot of people who have worries either way...of this reform bill being passed or not passed.  What do you predict is going to happen with this proposal?

     

    How have you personally navigated the insurance maze?  Do you have any personal stories to share about how you have had to fight with insurance companies to get medical tests or treatment?

     

    We want to hear your story!

     

     

    Reply
  6. How you can read the actual bill being proposed...
    Merely Me
    Friday, August 21, 2009 at 05:50 PM

    Hi there!

     

    For any of you who are interested, Health Central has a link to Obama's health care reform bill which you may find here.

     

    I hope this helps some!

     

     

    Reply
  7. What's in the proposals
    Lisa Emrich
    Friday, August 21, 2009 at 09:07 PM

    A side-by-side comparison of the twelve health reform proposals in motion, including H.R.3200, can be found on this page created by the Kaiser Family Foundation.  You can also download a printable pdf of the comparisons.  Very clear presentation of information.

     

    Also, take a moment to make your thoughts and experiences know regarding your own health care.  Please visit the Gratitude Friday and Health Care post.

     

    Thanks,

    Lisa

    Reply
  8. Pres. Obama's propsed health care plan
    Sherry O
    Saturday, August 22, 2009 at 12:52 AM

    Being from Canada, I am fortunate to live in a country that already has Universal Health Care.  This means that we all receive health care regardless of income.  Our taxes pay the cost for our health care services.  We are so fortunate that a few decades ago, a man named Tommy Douglas, worked tirelessly for many years to ensure that every Canadian should and would receive the health care needed.  As an aside, Tommy Douglas is Keiffer Sutherland's grandfather and the father of Keiffer's mother, Shirley Douglas, who is a wonderful actress of stage and screen. She was once married to Keiffer's father, Donald Sutherland.

    The system is not without it's problems, the biggest being money.  Our tax dollars are needed to look after so many things that our country deems important but, the cost is high.  Hospitals, doctor's, clinics, home care and many other of the services we have enjoyed, are stretched.

    I personally feel that it is a sad commentary on our society when we are okay with the money entertainers of all types, people in sports and others, I'm sure, who make more money than those who literally work in life and death situations, continually expected to have the most up to date equipment, continue to educate themselves and upgrade their skills and take alot of verbal abuse from people who would rather complain about the health care professionals rather than supporting them and trying to work with them to come up with a solution.

    When did it become acceptable to pay a baeball player 50 million dollars over 2 or 3 years to play a game that he loves?  When I think of what that kind of money could do in communties for not only health care but, for many of the social services that would benefit everyone on so very many levels.

    Don't get me wrong, I know that I am extremely blessed with the health care I receive.  I do hope that Pres. Obama will suceed dispite those with other agendas that usually means lining their pockets with more money. You have many fine people who give, generously, to help those who do not have health insurance but, there are alot of people living in the U.S. (there are more people living in New York city than the entire country of Canada!), those very generous few can't do it on thir own. It will take new mindsets, alot of hard work and the support of those who are trying to make this change happen.  We do not have "lobbyists" in Canada but the "backroom boys club" is alive and well. These are another group of people who get very large pay cheques to persuade those who have the power to make happen or not as the case may be.  I need to change this thought process, if I get started on the fool's that make up a large part of our political system, it will be very long and definately an inappropriate response to the question asked.  Greed is systemic in most of the western world. 

    I wish your current government all the best in, at the very least, getting some of the changes started.  Hopefully, the system we have can help and we can work together to make it an awesome system without having to spend time on reinventing the wheel.  What a wonderful opportunity to show the rest of the world how respect and hard work can make things a whole lot better.  Being kind to one another and ourselves wouldn't hurt either.

    Boy, I really can get up on that soap box!  Perhaps you figured out that I spent most of my working years in social services.

    SherryO

    Reply
    re: Pres. Obama's propsed health care plan
    Merely Me
    Saturday, August 22, 2009 at 11:57 AM

    Hi Sherry!

     

    I really appreciate that you are voicing your opinion here.  I think a lot of folk wonder about the Canadian system but don't know much about it so...if you could...can you tell us more details. 

     

    Are there long waiting periods to get tests or treatment?  If you need an MRI...how long does it take to be scheduled for one for example.  Are the taxes overwhelming for most Canadians to pay?  What do most Canadians feel about the American health care system?  Would anybody from Canada want to come here for our health care?

     

    We absolutely want to hear more from you on this topic...I hope to keep an on-going discussion going.

    Reply
  9. Untitled Comment
    Anonymous
    Saturday, August 22, 2009 at 02:05 PM

    Generally I agree with the President on the need to reform the way health care costs are administered in order to both assure healthcare for all of our citizens, while managing the costs involved. While I personally feel that a single payer (government operated) program would do this most efficiently, if we are to control cost within our present framework, the only thing I see that might cause cost to drop is competition with added regulation. That is why I presently support the so called government option.

    Without the government option, regulation will be needed to prevent the dropping of insurance coverage when people become ill. Regulation will also be needed to require the acceptance of coverage by anyone who loses their insurance for whatever reason, such as the insurance company going out of business, or the loss of a job. Regulation will be needed to require that everyone buy a policy as well. Also the basics of coverage will need to be regulated, similar to the way we require a driver to provide certain types and levels of coverage on their automobile in case of accident. This is only the beginning of all the details to regulate of course. Better to have a government option that does provide the basics and just let the private companies compete with it instead of all this regulation. And if anyone is philosophically opposed to government plans, they can still buy the private plans and most likely at a more reasonable price. In fact, if its better, I will buy it too. That's competition at work.

    I also agree with the President's efforts to streamline the flow of information within our healthcare system. This is going to take a long time to accomplish, but it simply has to cost more money when every hospital, doctor's office, and insurance company, and pharmacy has their own methods of record keeping, billing and so forth. And the disconnected state of affairs we have today certainly does not help when doctors try to coordinate the care of any given patient.

    I think we really could be getting a lot more for our health care money in this country. It does cost. I understand that. You do not get something for nothing. If I hear all the fuss at the town hall meetings correctly, people apparently do not want to pay a dime in tax, however, everything must be all better about the high costs of insurance coverage (that goes up every year) cause I do not hear anyone complaining about that anymore... but me. I actually would be glad to pay the tax to improve the healthcare system of this country. If this will purchase the security of not having to worry about losing health coverage some day it will be worth it.

     

    Reply
    re: Untitled Comment
    momdukes
    Saturday, August 22, 2009 at 08:17 PM

    Wow, I had told myself that I was not going speak on this, buy here I am.  I really do not know what to think.  But working for Social Services, I must say, something has got to give.  There are people, so many people who are sick, and children who come in daily, who do not have any health insurance and doctors who will actually turn them away if they have no insurance, and I mean turn them away; because for them it is about the dollar, not the sick child or parent, but the dollar.  Example:  for people who receive Medicad they are treated differently than those who are fourtante enough to have private insurance.  Persnsonal experience; my daugther was sick about three weeks ago went to her doctor who mainly services Medicaid recipients, he mistook my daugther for one of those particular patients, which it should not have made any difference.  Diagnosed her wrong, because he just blew her off, she ended up being put in the hospital with Spinal Minajinus, he told her it was all in her headSurprised He thought she was on government Medicaid.  You see how it could eaisly put a label on people here in the states, I have friends in other countried who do not eperience this.  Just something to think about.  As old people say, "Everything that glitters, aint gold".  We need to just sit and wait, then make our decisions

    That is what I am going to do. sherry/smomdukesKiss

    Reply
    re: re: Untitled Comment
    Eva L. DeNicola
    Sunday, August 23, 2009 at 12:20 PM

    There are some good points in the what the Presidents states, however it's a trillion more dollars my son will have to pay he will be four in November.

    What I've heard so far reminds me of when I worked for an HMO group callled HIP.

    I recall the doctors being so frustrated because they could not order certain tests for their patients. It had to go through the administration non-medical people, and it was always the cost that seemed more important than the patient.  I do recall a mother of only 35 years of age with a beautiful young daughter, being in this situation. She died. I will never forget seeing the doctor I worked for cry like he did, this should of never happened over money & not allowing him to do his job. He went off and started his own practice.

    I'm opened minded, but when the politcians can't explain or answer questions, why rush it, read the bill, make bullet points, I just have a strange feeling about this rush to push it.

    My meds exceeds 70 thousand dollars a year for my RRMS, are they going to change my drugs and MRI if I can't afford my insurance at one point? Do they even have generic meds for Avonex? I'm lucky I have great insurance. I pay 25.00 a month for my Avonex, but will the government consider the 70 grand too much for a 42 year old mother? I'm on the fence and will read the bill, thank you for bringing this up.

    You are an amazing person Merely Me.

    Reply
    re: re: re: Untitled Comment
    KJ
    Sunday, August 23, 2009 at 02:17 PM

    You make an excellent point about how these bills are being rushed through. The president had said that he wanted to pass a bill before the August recess. Why should something so important and complex be rushed like that? You can see from the discussion here that this is a difficult topic. Look at the thousands of pages in each of these bills - if you have the time and patience. As stated, even some of the politicians are saying that they are too long to read through.

    Reply
    re: Untitled Comment
    Merely Me
    Sunday, August 23, 2009 at 09:13 PM

    Thank you for your well reasoned comment!  I think there are many who would agree with you.  There are many things in our country which are being run by government such as public schools, our police force, firemen, all paid by taxes.  I guess I don't understand the alarm over having a public health care option.  What am I missing? 

    Reply
    re: re: Untitled Comment
    KJ
    Monday, August 24, 2009 at 07:46 AM

    According to my understanding of the Constitution, those things not directly run by the Federal government (and listed in the constitution) will fall to the States. (Article 1 Section 8 and Article 1 Section 10) The Consititution also lays out how the President can choose his cabinet (and cabinet members are the  heads of departments) (Article 2 Section 2), but those cabinet members should be confirmed ("under advice and consent of the Senate"). Now, according to the Constitution, health care is not one of the things that this the responsibility of the federal government. It falls on the states. The president has said that he will appoint a "Health Care Czar" (who is not subject to confirmation by the legislative branch) to run the health care system.

     

    I think its fine to have the government run certain things at tax-payer expense. Local police and fire departments are funded by city, county, and state taxes and enforce city, county, and state laws and standards. We still have county hospitals in some places I'm sure (I can't think of any off hand anymore). This isn't a bad thing but I can't see how they can operate just based off of local taxes.

     

    I'm interested in how a public option mixed with a private option would work. It seems that the public option would be much cheaper because they don't have to make a profit. From what I've read of the House and Senate bills so far, the private option can only exist for a limited period of time - eventually everyone would have to convert to the public plan - so it's probably a mute point.

     

    I'm concerned that under the public (government funded and run) health care system there will be less emphasis on research, product improvement, etc. This is especially true for people suffering from "incurable" diseases. Next time you visit the Post Office or Department of Motor Vehicles, take a look at their computer systems and compare them to UPS and other private companies doing similar work.

    Reply
    re: Untitled Comment
    Merely Me
    Sunday, August 23, 2009 at 09:32 PM

    Thank you Eva, Momdukes, and KJ for a very civil but spirited debate!

     

    I do have my own personal biases on this topic as does everyone else.  But I will allow you all first to speak your mind....I want to listen.  You guys are doing an excellent job of articulating your points.  I am happy we are able to have such an intelligent discussion here. 

     

     

    Reply
  10. I just posted this issue in my blog earlier today
    Jim
    Sunday, August 23, 2009 at 09:23 PM

    I will repeat.

     

    Just thinking and wondering what would happen if both of my hearing-aids died today and I can't afford to buy them anytime soon. I need those hearing-aids to communicate with my family, friends and co-workers. Its a necessity, not cosmetic or anything. Most insurances do not cover at all or only cover partial. I have other bills like everyone else including those who are "able" who don't have any disabilities to spent money on.

    While I am against socialist concept of health care and prefer to have the flexibility to get the insurance we want through our employment or other means. There should be a way that the government can work with the employers to provide health insurance for ALL employees. Those who are unable to work should be able to get health care through the government.

    Its one of those thoughts I have been thinking lately. The only hope—for the doctors, for their patients, for all of us—is for the doctors to assert a moral principle. Individual freedom and personal choice, rooted in American values, provide principled health care, moral health care, and the best health care. That is why United States have the best in the world. The only problem is that "lack of funds" by those who needs medical attention.

    Today, we need to define, understand and establish health and medical ethical boundaries. Both morality and politics must be discussed before the relation between political rights and health care can be appreciated. If the government controls everything, do we think it will be more responsive to the needs of individual patients? We should look at the public education as an example.

    However, as you can see, public education have not been doing so good lately in the United States. Other countries are gaining ahead of us in educating our kids.

    Now, I have Multiple Sclerosis to deal with and my financial picture is not very pretty.

    Reply
    re: I just posted this issue in my blog earlier today
    Merely Me
    Sunday, August 23, 2009 at 09:38 PM

    Hi Jim!

     

    So good to see you!  Thank you for coming by!

     

    This is an excellent comment you make.  I would have to agree with you...there has to be a better way.  People should not have to worry about both illness and then on top of it, wondering how in the world they will be able to pay for it.  We have facts about the way that it is now...and people are dieing because they cannot pay for their medical care.  And this is in America.  It is hard to believe that we allow this to go on. 

     

    I promised I would keep quiet but...there I go.  Can't help it.

     

    Thank you so much for your comment and please do keep sharing  in our discussions.  Always love to hear from you. 

    Reply
  11. Public and private plans can coexist
    Dan
    Wednesday, September 02, 2009 at 11:08 AM

    One thing that has frustrated me in this debate is the idea that a public option will necessarily drive private insurers out of business.  On a superficial level, this makes sense; a government-run insurance plan wouldn't have to turn a profit, and it has a huge amount of bargaining power. There's no question it would eat into private insurers' market share.

     

    But look--have public universities driven private universities out of existence? Has drug research by the NIH driven pharmaceutical companies out of business?  Have government-run student loan programs like Stafford or Pell eliminated private student loan companies like Sallie Mae?  No.  And in each case, the competition has benefited consumers while still allowing private companies a healthy bottom line.

     

    I think a government insurance option can certainly coexist with private insurers.  Some private companies will go out of business, but only the ones that provide the least coverage, have the least choice of doctors, or drop people for technicalities once they become sick.  Businesses will provide fully featured private insurance plans as a way to attract top employees and keep them productive.  Small businesses and startups (and there are a lot of these) will be greatful to no longer face the decision of

    1) providing expensive private insurance benefits and going out of business, or 2)

    offering no coverage and watching their employees get sick or refuse to take a position in the first place.

     

    While I think we certainly need to think hard about how a public insurance option will be financed, I reject the premise that any program by the government will necessarily drive private insurers out of business, and begin a steady march toward socialism.  I don't enjoy the government interfering with my life, by I am grateful when they build transportation networks or ensure the safety of my food or provide for my defense or, yes, when they allow me to get medical care when I don't have any other realistic options.

     

     

    Reply
  • Font size
  • Bookmark
  • Was this helpful? Yes
  • Save
  • RSS
  • Report Abuse

Ask a Question

Get answers from our experts and community members.

View all questions (1041) >