Sign in

or Register now

MultipleSclerosisCentral.com

See all of our health sites at www.HealthCentral.com
Wednesday, November, 25, 2009
  • Font size
Receive a FREE Osteoarthritis of the knee pamphlet. Start here.

The Debate over Digital Health Records

Jake Crest
Jake Crest
Close
Caregiver and Blogger

See my introductory post...

Jake Crest

Tuesday, January 13, 2009
View All of Jake Crest's Posts
President-elect Obama has made health care reform a cornerstone of his economic recovery plan. Skyrocketing costs, it's argued, could be slowed if patients health records were kept in a centralized database, accessible over a network and easily read by authorized healthcare professionals. Cost-saving...
  1. Centralized, digital medical files
    Franklin Catholic
    Saturday, January 17, 2009 at 12:09 AM

    Pure idiocy.  Benjamin Franklin had it right when he said that any people who preferred safety over liberty would have neither and deserved neither.  That could be applied here, as well.  When we decide that saving money and being comfortable is more important than liberty, then we're in a sad state, indeed.

    Reply
    re: Centralized, digital medical files
    Jake Crest
    Monday, January 19, 2009 at 03:51 PM

    Franklin,

     

    I don't recall saying that 'saving money and being comfortable is more important than liberty.' I was speaking about electronic health records and privacy concerns. I believe that you may have taken too great an intuitive leap in jumping from one to the other.

     

    Personally, I am very conscious of privacy matters and fully recognize the potential for loss of privacy in our digital world. However, I am also a pragmatist and, as such, recognize that much, if not most, of privacy is an illusion. The sad truth is that each time a new user connects to the internet for the first time, another citizen's privacy is lost or about to be lost. It's been shown time and time again that people will, for the most part, sell their privacy for a simple promise of FREE SHIPPING or a $10 OFF coupon.

     

    It would be wonderful if we could somehow go back in time and reinvent our digital world with an eye on protecting each others privacy, but we can't. While I certainly accept the premise that true liberty carries with it a guarantee of privacy, I would argue that liberty does not depend completely upon the exercise of that guarantee.

    Reply
    re: re: Centralized, digital medical files
    Franklin Catholic
    Monday, January 19, 2009 at 08:01 PM

    "I don't recall saying that 'saving money and being comfortable is more important than liberty.' I was speaking about electronic health records and privacy concerns. I believe that you may have taken too great an intuitive leap in jumping from one to the other."

     

    What???  I was not saying that YOU said that.  When I wrote, "pure idiocy", I was not referring to your thoughts or your assessment, but rather what was being proposed....in other words, my problem was not with your description or your assessment, but of the proposal itself.  It was my understanding that you wanted our thoughts about THIS ISSUE, not with your description of it.  Obviously I was mistaken.

     

    If you want us to comment on an issue, then fine.  Please make that clear.  If you want to quibble over our comments, then frankly I'd rather just keep them to myself.  Don't invite our comments then slam them.

    Reply
    re: re: re: Centralized, digital medical files
    Jake Crest
    Tuesday, January 20, 2009 at 10:53 AM

    Franklin,

     

    It was unclear as to what you were referring to with the comment, 'pure idiocy.' I read it as a knee-jerk response to my position and felt compelled to reply.

     

    However, if, as you state, I misinterpreted your comment, then I do apologize and hope that you will continue to participate in the discussions.

     

    Jake

    Reply
  2. Untitled Comment
    Gloria
    Sunday, January 18, 2009 at 07:25 AM

    Frown One of my doctors who happens to use computer in the exam room spends too much time looking at the computer and typing, etc than actually listening to me as the patient. This is a problem! Plus, the office staff does not know the computer system and is in training on the job while patients are not attended to properly. Each time I go there there are new office staff... so.. Is this good for the health care of all the patients...? Not from the experiences I have had there.

     

    A different doctor I go to is not like this... she is actually listening to me, treating me as needed or better and the office staff is great! So the computer can be good or bad depending on the office and staff...


    But training should not be OJT at the expense of the patients....

     

     

     

    Reply
    re: Untitled Comment
    Jake Crest
    Monday, January 19, 2009 at 03:58 PM

    Gloria,

     

    While I sympathize with your situation, and agree that the doctors office is no place for on-the-job training, the problem here seems to be the doctor and his staff, not the fact that he has placed your medical records in an electronic database. I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that perhaps it might benefit both you and your doctor if, the next time you are in his office, you tell him how you feel and give him an opportunity to respond.

     

    Jake

    Reply
  • Font size
  • Bookmark
  • Thank you for your input
  • Save
  • RSS
  • Report Abuse

Ask a Question

Get answers from our experts and community members.

View all questions (1022) >