Saturday, May 25, 2013

Insurance and Financial Concerns

I'm looking into knee replacements. I know I need at least a unicompartmental implant. I could have a total knee replacement. How much of a cost savings is the unicompartmental?

A recent study from the University of California (Los Angeles) compared the cost-effectiveness of these two procedures. Both were used for patients with joint damage from osteoarthritis (OA).

The unicompartmental was selected for patients with changes on one side of the joint. The total joint was implanted in patients with generalized joint destruction on both sides.

The unicompartmental implant represented a cost savings of about 25 per cent over a TKR. The value added to the patient's life in terms of reduced pain and improved function was equal. Complications and problems after surgery can drive the costs up for either type of implant.

Long-term benefit may be less with the unicompartmental because survival of the implant may be less. This is based on studies so far that reflect the long-term outcomes of TKRs. Similar studies for unicompartmental implants are under way.

Reference:

Nelson F. SooHoo, MD, et al. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty as an Alternative to Total Knee Arthroplasty for Unicompartmental Osteoarthritis. In The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. September 2006. Vol. 88-A. No. 9. Pp. 1975-1982.'

This is an excerpt from eOrthopod.com, a website providing patients with clear, accurate and understandable information about their orthopedic and musculoskeletal conditions and injuries. eOrthopod.com includes a comprehensive library of multimedia web topics, news articles and FAQ database on musculoskeletal health. eOrthopod.com also hosts eOrthopodTV, in depth video interviews with practicing clinicians about the evaluation and treatment of common conditions and injuries of the muscles, bones and joints. For more information, visit eOrthopod.com.