WEDNESDAY, Aug. 15 (HealthDay News) -- Drug company spending on direct-to-consumer advertising continues to skyrocket, even as criticisms against it have soared.
Calling for a moratorium, rather than just restrictions, on such advertising might be in order, say the authors of a study in the Aug. 16 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.
"Direct-to-consumer advertising spending is increasing in terms of its share of total marketing budget, but it's still a smaller share relative to promotion aimed at influencing prescribers," said study author Julie M. Donohue, an assistant professor of health policy and management at the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration started allowing direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs on television 10 years ago.
Since that time, spots of Dorothy Hamill and Sally Field
peddling
But so, too, has criticism of the practice. Skeptics say that direct-to-consumer advertising encourages overuse of medications and drives up drug spending.
The controversy reached critical proportions when the
"It's been 10 years since the FDA clarified its policy with
respect to broadcast advertising and unleashed direct-to-consumer
advertising on television, which was new," Donohue said. "We wanted
to see, in the wake of the Vioxx withdrawal and an increased focus
on the
For this analysis, Donohue and her colleagues looked at pharmaceutical company spending on direct-to-consumer advertising and promotion to physicians over the past decade.
















