<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>



<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Craig  Stoltz's SharePosts</title>
    <description>Health Expert Craig  Stoltz shares health management news and commentary at HealthCentral.com. 

 HealthCentral.com is one of the top health destinations on the Web, with more than 35 condition-specific, wellness and general health Web properties.</description>
    <link>http://www.healthcentral.com/profiles/c/5133/index</link>
    <atom:link>
      <href>http://www.healthcentral.com/profiles/c/5133/rss</href>
      <rel>self</rel>
      <type>application/xml</type>
    </atom:link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>15</ttl>
    
    <item>
      <guid>http://www.healthcentral.com/prostate/c/5133/28476/proscar-questioned</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 09:48:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Craig  Stoltz</dc:creator>
      <title>Proscar, Aggressive Tumor Risk Questioned</title>
      <description>Proscar, a widely used drug used to shrink the prostate, may not cause aggressive prostate cancer tumors after all. Back in 2003, a big government study found that Proscar reduced risk of developing prostate cancer by 25 percent--but appeared to boost the incidence of aggressive, potentially lethal tumors.
&amp;nbsp;
Well, five years later doctors have taken a second look at that data and decided Proscar doesn't appear to boost risk of those...</description>
      <link>http://www.healthcentral.com/prostate/c/5133/28476/proscar-questioned</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid>http://www.healthcentral.com/prostate/c/5133/14375/waiting-expected</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:51:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Craig  Stoltz</dc:creator>
      <title>Waiting: Perhaps Less of a Stressor Than Expected</title>
      <description>One of the most persuasive arguments against &amp;quot;watchful waiting&amp;quot;--taking no action on slow-growing prostate cancer contained to the gland until circumstances change--is that the anxiety of knowing there&amp;#39;s a cancer down there is too much to bear. A surprising new study shows that, at least in one group of men observed, watchful waiters may not  suffer high anxiety.&amp;nbsp;Bottom line first&amp;nbsp;According to a study on prostate cancer...</description>
      <link>http://www.healthcentral.com/prostate/c/5133/14375/waiting-expected</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid>http://www.healthcentral.com/prostate/c/5133/13736/cancer-risk</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:28:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Craig  Stoltz</dc:creator>
      <title>Finasteride, Prostate Growth... and Cancer Risk</title>
      <description>A fascinating study out of the National Cancer Institute has significant implications for men at risk for prostate cancer and men with enlarged prostates--for most men, really. But the study invites possible overinterpretation. Let&amp;#39;s parse it carefully.&amp;nbsp;Bottom line first&amp;nbsp;Finasteride, a drug used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (non-cancerous prostate enlargement, also known as BPH) has previously been linked to a reduction in...</description>
      <link>http://www.healthcentral.com/prostate/c/5133/13736/cancer-risk</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

