Friday, May 22, 2009 thilaga, Community Member, asks

Q: how RA symptoms are produced if RA factor is negative

In some cases RA factor is negative in lab test.

but they show the symptoms of  rheumatoid arthritis how?

Answer This
Answers (4)
Lene Andersen, Health Guide
5/27/09 7:39pm

Just one addition - we recently published a post about blood test, what they mean and why they are not the only indicator of RA. You can read that here.

Reply
andrew, Community Member
5/22/09 1:08pm

From what I understand, RA factor is not the cause of RA, just one possible blood indicator that is present in 70-80% of folk who have RA symptoms. On the other hand, there are people who test positive for RA factor and don't ever have symptoms (maybe never will or maybe later). The newer anti-CCP test is more accurate but still not 100%. This speaks to the complicated nature of RA. We still don't know all the causes and mechanics of it. Many researchers/doctors believe that there are actually many types or families of RA. That could be one reason why RA factor is negative in some people. The bottom line is that the sypmtoms are caused by inflammation brought on by your own immune system.

 

Many people around this RA Central forum, including myself, are RA factor negative (or seronegative). But we have all the symptoms. RA is a clinical diagnosis, not solely based on a blood test. It can be frustrating at times for those who are seronegative. You want a blood test to point to, sometimes people (even doctors) treat them differently, you question what's going on. But all it takes to remind me is to get a really bad flare and to inject myself once a week with medicine!

Reply
andrew, Community Member
5/22/09 5:10pm

Just got back from a doc appointment and we talked about this very issue today. He said that it's well known that many patients don't show positive blood tests. But a diagnosis can be made without them. Even thought I'm "seronegative", he says I have RA. Seronegative arthritis, seronegative rheumatoid arthritis, or just rheumatoid arthritis, etc...call it what you will but it's treated all the same. When speaking to friends and family, I just call it RA now to avoid any confusion. He mentioned that "we know how to diagnose and treat RA, but we just don't know about all the underlying causes. The silver lining...seronegative cases tend to be less severe.

Reply
Dottie, Community Member
8/13/09 7:52am

I was just recently tested for RA and Lupus and both came back negative.  What other testing can they do if the negative RA test could still mean I have RA?

Reply
andrew, Community Member
8/13/09 7:07pm

There are a limited number of blood tests that are related to RA. RA is a clinical diagnosis based primarily on symptoms. Check out the diagnosis criteria from the American College of Rheumatology that doctors use...

 

http://www.rheumatology.org/publications/classification/ra/ra.asp?aud=mem

 

4 out of 7 symptoms and you're classified with RA and positive blood tests are only one of the 7.

Reply
Kelly Young, Community Member
5/22/09 9:07pm

I totally agree with Andrew. He is correct. There are several antibodies which are produced in a body with RA. The RF is only one of them. It just happened to be the first. The anti-CCP, discovered more recently, is more "accurate" because it corresponds better (90%) with the actual disease.

 

Hope you get treatment, if you need it, regardless of the RF.

Good luck, Kelly Cool

 

www.rawarrior.blogspot.com

 

 

Reply
Angela53510, Community Member
5/27/09 10:45pm

If you have symptoms, don't let the sed negative test throw you off. It is a test of sedimentation. That means that your joints have eroded, and the little pieces of bone - called sediments because they are so small, and that is the diagnostic tool they use, along with classic symptoms.

 

In my case, I was exercising lots, drinking loads of water, and probably not a lot of build up initally of sediment - over a year before I was diagnosed without the blood test.  Eventually, my sed rate sky rocketed, before I got everything under control.  The sad thing is - I am sed negative again, because my disease is in remission, but I got a look at the results of my yearly xrays, and they said, "continued slow erosion of joints."  So the rate is greatly slowed with the right meds, pain free, but in 20 or 30 years, should I live that long, the damage will continue to accumulate. One of the things they don't tell you.  But I am happy not to be in pain, I exercise on a bike and with weights. play flute again, I am working part time on an M.Div, so life goes on. 

 

If you are sed negative, and have terrible joint pain -fight, be aggressive, and don't take NO for an answer. Keep trying older rheumies, (they have learned from experience), and get on the meds you need. 

Reply
Answer This

Important:
We hope you find this general health information helpful. Please note however, that this Q&A is meant to support not replace the professional medical advice you receive from your doctor. No information in the Answers above is intended to diagnose or treat any condition. The views expressed in the Answers above belong to the individuals who posted them and do not necessarily reflect the views of Remedy Health Media. Remedy Health Media does not review or edit content posted by our community members, but reserves the right to remove any material it deems inappropriate.

By thilaga, Community Member— Last Modified: 12/24/10, First Published: 05/22/09