Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Introducing Mood 24/7, a new tool that helps you track your mood from day to day using your mobile phone. Try it today!

Question of the Week - Forced Treatment Versus Free Choice

Two years ago I wrote a SharePost about Crazy, the book by Pete Earley which documented his son's entanglement with the legal system after committing a crime.  The actively psychotic man was sent home from the hospital because he wasn't considered a danger to himself or others.  He then bro...
7/22/09 11:56pm
I can't say that I have spent a lot of time thinking about this but my initial response is that if the person has not posed a serious problem such as being a threat to themselves or someone else, they should be offered counseling or seek it themselves if there is competent counseling available. The only time that they should be forced against their will (like anyone else) is if they have made a serious violation the law or threatened someone harm. Another issue is if they are totally unable to take care of themselves for lack of being able to support themselves or something. It goes without saying that if they live off of the government that they should comply with the terms of that, whatever that might be. That still does not make the treatment "right" but it is likely the "best option" there is. It is like my counselor that wanted to put me back another year in HS which I am sure does not make the salary that I make today. What were that person's qualifications to be telling me what I should be doing? That is why a free market and free society are so important and we should think twice or three times before we take someone's rights away. That's a good question. One problem is that there is apparently not that much money in helping another person help themselves through "nominal" means anymore. If you can't make a buck off of them, no one is interested. There needs to be more study and understanding of sza so that there can be more help for people who need it. This web site is a good start.
7/23/09 4:21am

The jail system is now the biggest inpatient housing in the U.S. The Los Angelos county jail has more innmates with a mental diagnosis than any hospital. Even the Broome county jail here has more mentally diagnosed than the state hospital or the local hospital.

 

Forcing someone into taking treatment will work only as long as they are confined. Let me explain. The state hospital does not allow smoking in any building or the grounds. Recently I went up there and observed people hiding and smoking, despite the law.

 

Stopping meds or treatment is never a good idea. I say that from my own experience. I have never been forced into treatment.

 

How do we know if someone needs help? If they show no signs of aggression or a desire to hurt, how can we know?

 

We live in a free society.

 

After reading what I just wrote I am torn. I'm on the fence as to this question. I've been on both sides and cannot say with all certainty what would be best. Treatment should be individualized to the person. Warehousing patients didn't work. Out patient programs didn't work.

 

Where do we go from here?

 

Dave

7/23/09 10:20pm

Right now I'm still processing the news that my ex-boyfriend, who was doing so well, went off his meds.  Just had a tet-a-tet with a friend about this.

 

What do you do when someone is actively psychotic and refuses treatment? 

 

She suggested, "People do not always act in their best interests even if they don't have a mental illness."  Her analogy was the teen girl whose family tells her to wait until marriage before having unprotected sex, who goes out and gets pregnant.  A less extreme example is my father, who fails to take his fish oil gel caps even though the doctor has told him to take them.

 

Perhaps because I'm focused on finding solutions for people living with someone who has SZ, or for those of us diagnosed with SZ, I feel the mental healthcare system often falls short of helping people in crisis.  So like Dave said, the jails have become the largest public mental health hospitals in America.

 

Please, feel free to comment about whether you think involuntary commitments could benefit some people, or whether the right to choose should prevail.

 

In August, I'll be writing a SharePost about an intriguing new alternative to hospital stays: respite care for individuals with SZ, who need acute care, where they are tended to by peers with mental illnesses instead of professional staff.

 

As always, your comments are welcome.

 

Regards,

Christina

7/23/09 11:27pm

We have the same dilemma in the circles of Scriptural (or religious) teaching at times. It is good for a person to have no influence from the outside world in order to be able to comprehend what the teaching is all about but if the person doesn't want to be confined, it would be like forcing them against their will. It is better for the sake of not imposing your will on another person to let them go even if they end up hurting themselves as a result. At least it is not your fault either way because you tried to help the person and the person refused and you are not at fault for holding them against their will because you let them go. It is the same principle. You can try to justify it by saying, "Yeah, but they are better off now." but two wrongs don't make a right. Sometimes people have to be let go. The only exception is if they harm someone because then you have to protect the person being harmed.

7/23/09 11:41pm

The whole system is flawed when a mentally ill person commits a crime, and ends up in jail. We are not criminals, yet we can do things without thinking or knowing what they mean. The people in the system should be taught to look for the signs of a person with a severe mental illness and these ill people need not be housed with others who are in fact criminals. But the problem runs so much deeper too. How are we to distinguish between mentally ill and not? I can't get my head around it... but I feel sorry for the poor people who get caught up in the system. I was there too, but luckily only for a short time- however it has far reaching implications even then. I am haunted every day by that time in my life where I was in a padded cell, with no freedom. That's another story altogether.  Anyway, I think no one can be made to take meds although sometimes they really should be...... and if someones going to fall, they will fall and learn from their own errors.... nothing can stop it in the end.

 

7/24/09 9:01am

For my second [and last] hospitalization, I was committed against my will.

 

Had I not been, I'm certain I'd be dead.

 

Chris

7/24/09 9:57pm

I agree that if it is determined that the person is a threat to themselves or someone else, they should be put into treatment and the treatment facility should be "sterile".

7/24/09 12:00pm

Its sad that there are some who are "forced" into treatment. I was committed by the police once. I would be dead if they hadn't been called.

 

Earlier this year I had the opportunity to speak to the patients at the state hospital. There were some who are forced to be there. Many have had mulitple admissions, only to feel that system failed them. We used to call them "lifers." They feel justified in their anger.

 

I was taught the philosphy that if I did the same thing over and over, expecting different results was not a course or cause for recovery. Change is necessary. Change begins with the acknowledgement that there is a problem.

 

I had a bunch of AA buddies. There were about 7 of us that would pal around. All had a mental diganosis and all but me went back to drinking and drugging. 

 

"You can lead a horse to the water, but you can't make him drink."

 

I understand the need for forced recovery, but it doesn't work. At least from what I've seen.

 

 

Dave

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anonymous
Anonymous
7/25/09 11:54pm

GREAT QUESTIONS. I could write a book about this topic. But here is a brief summary of how I feel. Since my brother's diagnosis about three years ago, I have thought about forced treatment non-stop. My point of view is much different than those who suffer with the illness. I have seen my brother without schizophrenia, without treatment and with treatment. When my brother is off meds and not well, I am haunted by memories from the past, during a time when he was at peace. I see how his delusions and voices rob him of his former life and inner peace. I believe in treatment because I see that recovery is possible. What I do not understand and may never understand is that when someone is so psychotic, and decides to almost run into traffic (this was because my brother thought bombs were headed towards my hotel) that a hospital would turn him away. The staff would not admit my brother simply because he popped one pill in his mouth. This happens after my parents drive 6 hours straight to the hospital and plead with the staff to take him in. Instead, my parents took him home in complete fear. This is a horrible way to live. There is no relief when he is not medicated. We know it will go downhill, every time he is not medicated. This brings me to the idea of force treatment. To me, the laws surrounding mental illness should allow for leeway or depend on the situation. In the case of psychosis, I believe that family should have some say when it comes to involuntary hospitalization. I say this because, it is not healthy for anyone involved when someone is clearly psychotic and not taking meds. Not to mention, 50% of individuals with schizophrenia have no insight that they are sick. This fact alone begs for more attention. Bottom line, the individual must WANT to get better. For many, this can take years. Our focus should be on facilitating recovery. Further more, I feel that the problems in the mental health system are pushed under the rug. Other illnesses seem to receive such positive PR and this leads to more research and better treatments. Society's view of mental illness can prevent someone from seeking treatment or accepting a diagnosis. If we reduce stigma, we can facilitate recovery. This is not a black and white situation no matter how you slice it. There are so many layers. The moment we as a society FEEL EMPATHY for those with mental illness, we may see change. We need to create laws or programs which will allow someone to reach recovery much faster and on their own terms. So I don't have any answers, just random thoughts. Recovery is an evolution. I am inspired by those who choose to evolve. They are the heroes in my mind. I will continue to fight for their dignity. Lastly, please check this site, I think you will find it interesting. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0CYZ/is_2_31/ai_n6114723/ 

 

7/27/09 12:31am
Thank you, Anonymous. You said it beautifully! I could write a book regarding my son's illness since, age 19 and he is 27 years of age and has been through it all, including jail. Still, he is one of the 50% who do not recognize their illness, "poor insight". He has been taken to the hospital for self-inflictions due to delusional, psychotic episodes and treated for the physical and released because he knows enough to say "I am not a threat to myself or anyone else" when the hospital staff can see what he did and hear how he is talking. They do not have room in their hospitals for difficult treatment and it is easier to overlook their mental illness especially, if the patient does not want to be there in the first place. Well, like you said, they take a pill or make promises or argue about not being a harm to themselves or others and that is enough for ER. We have been let down so many times when the hospital ER seemed to be the answer to prayer for their treatment. Even getting an EX PARTE from the court when the hospital failed us, only to have him observed for 72 hours and released. Then, of course, that has not helped in our relationship. So, the ones that love them the most are excluded from their care as they are of age to give consent. HIPPA, patient's rights, have not helped those who are so incapacitated and incapable of making decisions for their best interest and therefore, interferred with their getting treatment or adequate care. There are so many different situations regarding forced treatment, but, it is and should be considered only for those individuals that do not show the ability and understanding when they may say the words "I am not a threat to myself or others". One can evaluate whether this is true by the nature of what has brought them to that event. One has to use better judgement in handling the situations when it involves the illness of SZ. There is no room for error, or worrying about losing their license when, it involves the ones that really can not help themselves such as, those in a relapse or psychotic, delusional thinking although, can still reach way down inside of themselves when, their only words and thoughts are not making sense but somehow can come out with the "magic words" that will prevent their being helped. Please, we need laws to protect our loved ones from harming themselves or others because the laws we have now, only make it more difficult for them to get treatment. I don't have the answer for the source to provide these much needed programs that can help those that need help in getting stable. Not limiting them to only a 72 hour observation but, 6 to 9 month programs or whatever is necessary and with the help from the community in getting our loved ones the care necessary for getting their lives turned around. It is horrible to think that "only God helps those who help themselves"!! That is just is not biblical! God helps those who can not help themselves, but, we are obligated to be used by God in order to help those individuals. Turning our backs on this major illness and or, putting those sick in jail adding to their being victimized is not the answer! Allowing those in need to wander the streets to be victimized and the attitude that you can lead a horse to water but, you can't make them drink is not rational thinking because they shoot horses don't they?!! We need a program for the person with SZ that fit the category at that given time of need whether it be long term or short term. If they are not able to recognize their illness and the destruction they are bringing to themselves in relapse after relapse from refusing treatment, there needs to be an individualized program that will keep them safe and out of prison. We have laws to protect children and they are forced to take their medicine, why is the person with SZ that is not able to recognize their need for medication any different?? They may be of legal age, but, they should not have the right to hurt themselves or others and the term "harming themselves" needs to be reevaluated because not taking their meds does bring harm to themselves due to the fact they relapse and deteriate. They need our help to prevent further deteriation. We need to take a stand to change these laws that prevent treatment for this group of people but, not to put all people with SZ in that "group". Thank you, also, Christina. I am looking forward to reading your article regarding "respite care' in August. Thank you, for allowing me to write, what I feel is an injustice. It is such a frustration to those that feel so helpless in fighting to help our loved ones with this most devastating illnes but,also, fighting a system where the mentally ill "fall through the cracks".
Anonymous
sp
8/22/09 11:35pm

Perhaps the premise of your question needs to be challenged. Here's my question to you: "Should a person with IMPAIRED judgment be allowed to judge what is needed for themselves?" 

Ask a Question

Get answers from our experts and community members.

Btn_ask_question_med
View all questions (1460) >