It was a single Actinic Keratosis lesion and the dermatologist said it could be "just frozen off". My treatment seems to have cleared up the lesion, but I do have hypopigmentation (just like crysosurgery?) If I had noticed the biopsy recommendation on the original report I would not have self treated. Can I still get the area biopsied and what alternatives (inexpensive) considering I have no health ins. can I use at this point? The screening was done in July.
Since my originaI post I think I found the answer to most of my questions regarding cost and lack of health insurance in your skin cancer financial resources post. However the issue of not having a biopsy done beforehand is still a major concern.





Thanks very much for getting back to me. I was examined by an intern and then a Dermatologist. I brought the lesion to their attention as it was a new spot on my arm (6 weeks at that time). The intern suggested it looked like a type of psoriasis or an early "AK". The Dermatologist looked at it more closely and said "I am almost positive this is an early AK" with white spots beginning to form on top" . It was the white spots that made the dermatologist most confident about the "diagnosis". I was just told that I was fortunate that I came in for the screening as these "pre-cancerous lesions have an approximate risk of 5 to 10% of eventually becoming malignant". The doctor said that the lesion could be frozen off easily either at my own dermatologist's office (I dont have one, no health ins) or even done there; a major university hospital in the NYC area. The intern told me that this dermatologist had over 20 yrs. experience and was incredibly accurate in her diagnoses. I was a little stunned but not overly alarmed as there was no mention of any cancerous suspicion. Upon leaving, (15 minutes later), I was handed a standard form by another (clerical) staff member with a human body diagram pinpointing the location of the spot on my arm. It stated "Diagnosis:Actinic Keratosis" with an additional note "biopsy recommended" (which I didn't notice at that time) and it was signed by the doctor. No mention of the biopsy had been made during our conversations and thus no reason given for the handwritten recommendation. I do remember, however, the intern stating that this specific dermatologist is more cautious than most. I guess my fear or major concern is that if there was a need for the biopsy could I have hindered a proper pathological diagnosis by removing the lesion on my own? (As for contacting the doctor, this was a free public screening at a major hospital and many people showed up. I have serious doubts as to whether the doctor would remember my case specifically. However, I will follow your instructions as that does seem to be the logical place to start).